f01083939
Montréal, Quebec, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
984.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.78%
Deal Percentage
1.91% / 18.81 TiB
Duplication
262897
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
1.19 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Montréal, Quebec, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
984.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.78%
Deal Percentage
1.91% / 18.81 TiB
Duplication
262897
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
890.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.75%
Deal Percentage
0.7% / 6.25 TiB
Duplication
263025
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
San Jose, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
589.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.45%
Deal Percentage
15.71% / 92.63 TiB
Duplication
338184
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
452.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.95%
Deal Percentage
0.95% / 4.28 TiB
Duplication
433076
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
San Jose, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
599.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.56%
Deal Percentage
1.08% / 6.47 TiB
Duplication
358106
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10187 ms
Time to First Byte
258.82 Mbps
Bandwidth
San Jose, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
600.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.57%
Deal Percentage
1.07% / 6.41 TiB
Duplication
531351
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10197 ms
Time to First Byte
253.49 Mbps
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
63.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.69%
Deal Percentage
2.33% / 1.47 TiB
Duplication
86388
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
181.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.98%
Deal Percentage
5.24% / 9.5 TiB
Duplication
33136
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
93.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.02%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
91077
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
451.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.94%
Deal Percentage
2.84% / 12.81 TiB
Duplication
373449
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
305.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.34%
Deal Percentage
0.65% / 2 TiB
Duplication
421661
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
344.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.77%
Deal Percentage
1.13% / 3.91 TiB
Duplication
434233
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
93.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.03%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75017
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
93.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.03%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75455
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
93 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.02%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
91347
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
175.22 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.92%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
56092
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Gangseo-gu, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
184.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.02%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
131157
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ōi, Saitama, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
93.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.02%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
74227
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
59.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.65%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
93760
Total Claims
60%
RPA
60%
Consistent RPA
40%
Inconsistent RPA
10850 ms
Time to First Byte
5 Mbps
Bandwidth
Sydney, New South Wales, AU
Sample Piece URL not found
93.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.03%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
74384
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
187.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.05%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
69736
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Manila, National Capital Region, PH
Sample Piece URL not found
77.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.85%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75498
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Manila, National Capital Region, PH
Sample Piece URL not found
76.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.84%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75505
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
133.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.46%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
108883
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
113.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.25%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
78390
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
90.09 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.99%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
126908
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dubai, Dubai, AE
Sample Piece URL not found
91.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.01%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
126265
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
93.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.02%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
126419
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
110.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.21%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
78543
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
95.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.05%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
79161
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
152.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.67%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 32 GiB
Duplication
79335
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
968.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.6%
Deal Percentage
1.94% / 18.75 TiB
Duplication
153780
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
500.84 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.48%
Deal Percentage
3.93% / 19.69 TiB
Duplication
321440
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | 5.06 TiB | 62.16 TiB | 0.68% |
| 3 | 316.06 TiB | 954.5 TiB | 10.44% |
| 8 | 56.72 TiB | 473.75 TiB | 5.18% |
| 15 | 11.56 TiB | 173.44 TiB | 1.89% |
| 4 | 228.28 TiB | 927.84 TiB | 10.15% |
| 5 | 457.31 TiB | 2.28 PiB | 25.58% |
| 6 | 273.84 TiB | 1.67 PiB | 18.73% |
| 11 | 5.5 TiB | 62.91 TiB | 0.68% |
| 2 | 179.38 TiB | 371.31 TiB | 4.06% |
| 13 | 15.78 TiB | 205.16 TiB | 2.24% |
| 1 | 64 GiB | 96 GiB | 0% |
| 7 | 197.09 TiB | 1.37 PiB | 15.39% |
| 9 | 192 GiB | 1.69 TiB | 0.01% |
| 10 | 1.72 TiB | 17.41 TiB | 0.19% |
| 14 | 30.72 TiB | 430.06 TiB | 4.7% |
| 1.74 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||