f03178077
Manila, National Capital Region, PH
Sample Piece URL not found
99.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.62%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75470
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
24.99 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Manila, National Capital Region, PH
Sample Piece URL not found
99.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.62%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75470
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Manila, National Capital Region, PH
Sample Piece URL not found
98.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.6%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75493
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
497.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
13.12%
Deal Percentage
0.04% / 192 GiB
Duplication
108874
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
74.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.96%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
78388
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
152.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.02%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
78540
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
560.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
14.78%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
79159
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
568.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
14.99%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
79330
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Manila, National Capital Region, PH
Sample Piece URL not found
348.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.18%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
24187
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Manila, National Capital Region, PH
Sample Piece URL not found
348.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.18%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
24161
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE
Sample Piece URL not found
180.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.77%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
147750
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE
Sample Piece URL not found
181.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.78%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
147769
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
149.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.95%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
121375
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
149.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.94%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
105718
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
London, England, GB
Sample Piece URL not found
158.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.18%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
111379
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Jakarta, Jakarta, ID
Sample Piece URL not found
11.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.3%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
106214
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Virginia Beach, Virginia, US
Sample Piece URL not found
58.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.54%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
90689
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
3.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.08%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
90566
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
58.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.54%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
99720
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
58.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.53%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
100159
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Manila, National Capital Region, PH
Sample Piece URL not found
11.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.3%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
211631
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Manila, National Capital Region, PH
Sample Piece URL not found
11.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.3%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
211799
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
11.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.3%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
222412
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 23.47 TiB | 187.75 TiB | 4.94% |
| 7 | 28.09 TiB | 196.66 TiB | 5.18% |
| 1 | 4.84 TiB | 4.84 TiB | 0.12% |
| 2 | 453.59 TiB | 907.19 TiB | 23.9% |
| 6 | 3.75 TiB | 22.5 TiB | 0.59% |
| 3 | 463.28 TiB | 1.36 PiB | 36.63% |
| 9 | 2.97 TiB | 26.72 TiB | 0.7% |
| 5 | 112.72 TiB | 563.59 TiB | 14.85% |
| 4 | 123.81 TiB | 495.25 TiB | 13.05% |
| 1.19 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||