f01081394
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
199.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.09%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
91471
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
9.54 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
199.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.09%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
91471
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
299.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.15%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
278533
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Changsha, Hunan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
99.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.04%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
299693
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Montréal, Quebec, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
499.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.24%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
262897
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
506.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.38%
Deal Percentage
1.23% / 6.25 TiB
Duplication
263025
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
299.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.15%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
278554
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
San Jose, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
299.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.15%
Deal Percentage
1.46% / 4.38 TiB
Duplication
338184
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
197.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.06%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
433076
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
San Jose, California, US
400 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.2%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
358106
Total Claims
28%
RPA
28%
Consistent RPA
72%
Inconsistent RPA
10187 ms
Time to First Byte
258.82 Mbps
Bandwidth
San Jose, California, US
400 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.2%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
531351
Total Claims
23%
RPA
23%
Consistent RPA
77%
Inconsistent RPA
10197 ms
Time to First Byte
253.49 Mbps
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
196.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.03%
Deal Percentage
0.68% / 1.34 TiB
Duplication
373449
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
262.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.38%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
421661
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
199.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.1%
Deal Percentage
2.22% / 4.44 TiB
Duplication
434233
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Manila, National Capital Region, PH
Sample Piece URL not found
92.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.89%
Deal Percentage
1.46% / 1.34 TiB
Duplication
75505
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
94.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.95%
Deal Percentage
1.81% / 1.72 TiB
Duplication
46139
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
94.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.93%
Deal Percentage
1.33% / 1.25 TiB
Duplication
108883
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
43.41 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.89%
Deal Percentage
2.09% / 928 GiB
Duplication
78390
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
93.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.93%
Deal Percentage
1.03% / 992 GiB
Duplication
78543
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
95.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.96%
Deal Percentage
1.99% / 1.91 TiB
Duplication
79161
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
94.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.94%
Deal Percentage
1.09% / 1.03 TiB
Duplication
79335
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
209.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.29%
Deal Percentage
4.48% / 9.38 TiB
Duplication
153780
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
198.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.06%
Deal Percentage
1.36% / 2.69 TiB
Duplication
321440
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 252.84 TiB | 1.49 PiB | 31.19% |
| 5 | 2.06 TiB | 10.63 TiB | 0.21% |
| 2 | 32 GiB | 64 GiB | 0% |
| 3 | 4.44 TiB | 16.44 TiB | 0.33% |
| 7 | 174.81 TiB | 1.21 PiB | 25.42% |
| 8 | 259.56 TiB | 2.04 PiB | 42.82% |
| 693.75 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.