DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 144235

Client ID: f03143121

Report Detail
Report 144235 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

5.24 days

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
6 issues
Number of providers: 25
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
HTTP Retrievability
RPA
Piece URL
f01081394
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
399.59 TiB
3.85%
0.00%
Not reporting
90790
0.00%
0.00%
f01083919
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
199.78 TiB
1.92%
0.00%
Not reporting
58420
0.00%
0.00%
f01083939
Montréal, Quebec, CA
545.75 TiB
5.25%
0.29%
OK
255110
0.00%
0.00%
f01083949
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
532.09 TiB
5.12%
3.52%
Not reporting
250276
0.00%
0.00%
f01106668
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
880.19 TiB
8.47%
7.23%
OK
319874
67.58%
66.00%
f01315096
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
958.06 TiB
9.22%
6.39%
OK
388031
52.33%
67.00%
f01518369
San Jose, California, US
698.28 TiB
6.72%
30.19%
OK
312551
38.34%
33.00%
f01889668
San Jose, California, US
697.19 TiB
6.71%
30.08%
OK
387995
36.35%
27.00%
f03055005
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
1.06 PiB
10.41%
4.10%
OK
370826
32.52%
81.00%
f03055018
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
1.04 PiB
10.23%
2.08%
OK
356999
63.68%
90.00%
f03055029
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
992.81 TiB
9.56%
1.43%
OK
353201
67.73%
82.00%
f03144037
Gangseo-gu, Seoul, KR
61.38 TiB
0.59%
0.00%
OK
131157
0.00%
0.00%
f03148356
Ōi, Saitama, JP
62.34 TiB
0.60%
0.00%
OK
74227
0.00%
0.00%
f03156617
Sydney, New South Wales, AU
62.5 TiB
0.60%
0.00%
Not reporting
74384
0.00%
0.00%
f03179555
Singapore, Singapore, SG
46.78 TiB
0.45%
0.60%
OK
46139
0.00%
0.00%
f03179570
Singapore, Singapore, SG
76.59 TiB
0.74%
1.47%
OK
108874
0.00%
0.00%
f03179572
Los Angeles, California, US
93.22 TiB
0.90%
1.58%
OK
78388
0.00%
0.00%
f03188440
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
92.5 TiB
0.89%
0.00%
Not reporting
126908
0.00%
0.00%
f03190614
Dubai, Dubai, AE
93.25 TiB
0.90%
0.00%
OK
126265
0.00%
0.00%
f03190616
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
92.09 TiB
0.89%
0.00%
OK
126419
0.00%
0.00%
f03214937
Los Angeles, California, US
94.94 TiB
0.91%
1.25%
OK
78540
0.00%
0.00%
f03229932
Seoul, Seoul, KR
95.56 TiB
0.92%
2.09%
OK
79159
0.00%
0.00%
f03229933
Seoul, Seoul, KR
95.72 TiB
0.92%
2.06%
OK
79330
0.00%
0.00%
f03300963
Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN
406.25 TiB
3.91%
3.08%
OK
153780
0.00%
0.00%
f0870558
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
968.94 TiB
9.33%
1.24%
OK
318504
59.62%
51.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
25 TiB
25 TiB
0.24%
3
64 GiB
576 GiB
0%
4
4.28 TiB
31.44 TiB
0.3%
5
280.72 TiB
1.79 PiB
17.67%
6
437.22 TiB
2.63 PiB
25.87%
7
222.25 TiB
1.63 PiB
16.03%
8
126.63 TiB
1 PiB
9.89%
9
121.44 TiB
1.11 PiB
10.9%
10
198.03 TiB
1.93 PiB
19.05%
1.38 PiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
No results.