Report 15166

Client ID: f03143085

Report Detail

Report 15166 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Activity status not available

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

4 issues

Number of providers: 26

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	HTTP Retrievability	RPA
f010202	Dallas, Texas, US	62.5 TiB	1.28%	0.00%	Not reporting	39789	0.00%	0.00%
f01083939	Montréal, Quebec, CA	50.56 TiB	1.04%	5.50%	OK	35003	0.00%	0.00%
f01083949	Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN	34.78 TiB	0.71%	4.31%	OK	34709	0.00%	0.00%
f01106668	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	343.44 TiB	7.04%	0.00%	OK	119789	0.00%	0.00%
f01315096	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	487.84 TiB	10.00%	2.14%	OK	155016	0.00%	0.00%
f01518369	San Jose, California, US	293.25 TiB	6.01%	2.13%	OK	125742	0.00%	0.00%
f01889668	San Jose, California, US	290.91 TiB	5.96%	2.15%	OK	203617	0.00%	0.00%
f03055005	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	271.63 TiB	5.57%	2.29%	OK	174702	0.00%	0.00%
f03055018	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	474.84 TiB	9.73%	1.81%	OK	191236	0.00%	0.00%
f03055029	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	475.75 TiB	9.75%	0.62%	OK	192354	0.00%	0.00%
f03091739	Dallas, Texas, US	93.84 TiB	1.92%	0.10%	Not reporting	56092	0.00%	0.00%
f03144037	Paripark, Seoul, KR	176.59 TiB	3.62%	0.00%	Not reporting	131157	0.00%	0.00%
f03148356	Ōi, Saitama, JP	93.56 TiB	1.92%	0.00%	Not reporting	74227	0.00%	0.00%
f03151449	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	97.38 TiB	2.00%	0.00%	Not reporting	92143	0.00%	0.00%
f03151456	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	98.53 TiB	2.02%	0.00%	Not reporting	80983	0.00%	0.00%
f03156617	Sydney, New South Wales, AU	93.75 TiB	1.92%	0.00%	Not reporting	74384	0.00%	0.00%
f03173127	Dallas, Texas, US	93.75 TiB	1.92%	0.00%	OK	69499	0.00%	0.00%
f03178077	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	99.72 TiB	2.04%	0.00%	Not reporting	59998	0.00%	0.00%
f03178144	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	99.5 TiB	2.04%	0.00%	Not reporting	60160	0.00%	0.00%
f03179555	Singapore, Singapore, SG	49.03 TiB	1.01%	0.00%	OK	45560	0.00%	0.00%
f03179570	Singapore, Singapore, SG	99.44 TiB	2.04%	0.00%	OK	106879	0.00%	0.00%
f03179572	San Jose, California, US	99.63 TiB	2.04%	0.00%	OK	77339	0.00%	0.00%
f03214937	San Jose, California, US	99.44 TiB	2.04%	0.00%	OK	77444	0.00%	0.00%
f03229933	Seoul, Seoul, KR	98.25 TiB	2.01%	0.00%	OK	77771	0.00%	0.00%
f03300963	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	428.13 TiB	8.78%	3.65%	Yes(38225 claims)	120483	0.00%	0.00%
f0870558	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	271.75 TiB	5.57%	2.30%	OK	95991	0.00%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

Healthy

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	150.44 TiB	156.69 TiB	3.21%
2	209.41 TiB	431.38 TiB	8.84%
3	29.38 TiB	92.31 TiB	1.89%
4	41.69 TiB	171.47 TiB	3.51%
5	189.59 TiB	965.09 TiB	19.79%
6	174.94 TiB	1.04 PiB	21.78%
7	166.84 TiB	1.15 PiB	24.13%
8	53.13 TiB	425 TiB	8.71%
9	43.91 TiB	395.16 TiB	8.1%
	1.03 PiB Total

Wrong provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.