Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

Client ID: f03143085

PulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

0 B

Allocated DataCap

32 GiB
Propose a Dashboard
Report Detail
Report 14830 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Activity status not available

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
4 issues
Number of providers: 26
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
RPA
f010202
Dallas, Texas, US
62.5 TiB
1.29%
0.00%
Not reporting
39789
76.30%
0.00%
0.00%
f01083939
Montréal, Quebec, CA
26.47 TiB
0.55%
0.00%
OK
33433
39.25%
0.00%
0.00%
f01083949
Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN
32.66 TiB
0.67%
0.00%
OK
33260
1.22%
0.00%
0.00%
f01106668
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
343.44 TiB
7.09%
0.00%
OK
119789
38.66%
0.00%
0.00%
f01315096
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
487.84 TiB
10.08%
2.14%
OK
155016
52.15%
0.00%
0.00%
f01518369
San Jose, California, US
293.25 TiB
6.06%
2.13%
OK
125080
39.96%
0.00%
0.00%
f01889668
San Jose, California, US
290.91 TiB
6.01%
2.15%
OK
202905
34.85%
0.00%
0.00%
f03055005
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
271.63 TiB
5.61%
2.29%
OK
174702
92.87%
0.00%
0.00%
f03055018
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
474.84 TiB
9.81%
1.81%
OK
191236
48.61%
0.00%
0.00%
f03055029
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
466 TiB
9.62%
0.55%
OK
188404
0.13%
0.00%
0.00%
f03091739
Dallas, Texas, US
93.84 TiB
1.94%
0.10%
Not reporting
56092
78.14%
0.00%
0.00%
f03144037
Paripark, Seoul, KR
176.59 TiB
3.65%
0.00%
Not reporting
131157
73.59%
0.00%
0.00%
f03148356
Ōi, Saitama, JP
93.56 TiB
1.93%
0.00%
Not reporting
74227
76.69%
0.00%
0.00%
f03151449
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
97.38 TiB
2.01%
0.00%
Not reporting
92143
14.14%
0.00%
0.00%
f03151456
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
98.53 TiB
2.04%
0.00%
Not reporting
80983
19.30%
0.00%
0.00%
f03156617
Sydney, New South Wales, AU
93.75 TiB
1.94%
0.00%
Not reporting
74384
76.45%
0.00%
0.00%
f03173127
Dallas, Texas, US
93.75 TiB
1.94%
0.00%
OK
69499
76.98%
0.00%
0.00%
f03178077
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
99.72 TiB
2.06%
0.00%
Not reporting
59998
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03178144
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
99.5 TiB
2.06%
0.00%
Not reporting
60160
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03179555
Singapore, Singapore, SG
49.03 TiB
1.01%
0.00%
OK
45560
17.52%
0.00%
0.00%
f03179570
Singapore, Singapore, SG
99.44 TiB
2.05%
0.00%
OK
106879
3.22%
0.00%
0.00%
f03179572
San Jose, California, US
99.63 TiB
2.06%
0.00%
OK
77339
10.64%
0.00%
0.00%
f03214937
San Jose, California, US
99.44 TiB
2.05%
0.00%
OK
77444
9.59%
0.00%
0.00%
f03229933
Seoul, Seoul, KR
98.25 TiB
2.03%
0.00%
OK
77771
8.73%
0.00%
0.00%
f03300963
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
428.13 TiB
8.84%
3.65%
Yes(19093 claims)
120483
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f0870558
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
271.75 TiB
5.61%
2.30%
OK
95991
34.89%
0.00%
0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
Healthy
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
170.03 TiB
176.28 TiB
3.64%
2
191.13 TiB
394.75 TiB
8.15%
3
28.44 TiB
85.84 TiB
1.77%
4
42.69 TiB
176.41 TiB
3.64%
5
189.75 TiB
964.59 TiB
19.92%
6
179.94 TiB
1.07 PiB
22.56%
7
160.31 TiB
1.1 PiB
23.35%
8
53.13 TiB
425 TiB
8.77%
9
43.91 TiB
395.16 TiB
8.16%
1.03 PiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
No results.