Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

Client ID: f03143085

PulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

0 B

Allocated DataCap

32 GiB
Propose a Dashboard
Report Detail
Report 12829 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Activity status not available

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
4 issues
Number of providers: 24
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
RPA
f010202
Dallas, Texas, US
62.5 TiB
1.34%
0.00%
Not reporting
39789
77.54%
0.00%
0.00%
f01106668
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
343.44 TiB
7.35%
0.00%
OK
119789
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f01315096
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
487.84 TiB
10.43%
2.14%
OK
155016
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f01518369
San Jose, California, US
293.25 TiB
6.27%
2.13%
OK
121059
40.26%
0.00%
0.00%
f01889668
San Jose, California, US
290.91 TiB
6.22%
2.15%
OK
198265
39.30%
0.00%
0.00%
f03055005
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
271.63 TiB
5.81%
2.29%
OK
174702
13.92%
0.00%
0.00%
f03055018
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
474.84 TiB
10.16%
1.81%
OK
191235
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03055029
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
358.41 TiB
7.67%
0.00%
OK
165868
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03091739
Dallas, Texas, US
93.84 TiB
2.01%
0.10%
Not reporting
56092
79.03%
0.00%
0.00%
f03144037
Paripark, Seoul, KR
176.59 TiB
3.78%
0.00%
Not reporting
131157
76.60%
0.00%
0.00%
f03148356
Ōi, Saitama, JP
93.56 TiB
2.00%
0.00%
Not reporting
74227
78.24%
0.00%
0.00%
f03151449
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
97.38 TiB
2.08%
0.00%
Not reporting
92143
15.27%
0.00%
0.00%
f03151456
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
98.53 TiB
2.11%
0.00%
Not reporting
80983
19.80%
0.00%
0.00%
f03156617
Sydney, New South Wales, AU
93.75 TiB
2.01%
0.00%
Not reporting
74384
78.73%
0.00%
0.00%
f03173127
Dallas, Texas, US
93.75 TiB
2.01%
0.00%
OK
69499
78.34%
0.00%
0.00%
f03178077
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
99.72 TiB
2.13%
0.00%
Not reporting
59998
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03178144
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
99.5 TiB
2.13%
0.00%
Not reporting
60160
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03179555
Singapore, Singapore, SG
49.03 TiB
1.05%
0.00%
OK
45560
15.55%
0.00%
0.00%
f03179570
Singapore, Singapore, SG
99.44 TiB
2.13%
0.00%
OK
106879
3.83%
0.00%
0.00%
f03179572
San Jose, California, US
99.63 TiB
2.13%
0.00%
OK
77339
13.42%
0.00%
0.00%
f03214937
San Jose, California, US
99.44 TiB
2.13%
0.00%
OK
77444
10.72%
0.00%
0.00%
f03229933
Seoul, Seoul, KR
98.25 TiB
2.10%
0.00%
OK
77771
5.70%
0.00%
0.00%
f03300963
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
428.13 TiB
9.16%
3.65%
Yes(19093 claims)
120483
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f0870558
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
271.75 TiB
5.81%
2.30%
OK
95991
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
Healthy
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
202.81 TiB
209.06 TiB
4.47%
2
185.06 TiB
382.63 TiB
8.18%
3
6.44 TiB
23.81 TiB
0.5%
4
49.53 TiB
211.84 TiB
4.53%
5
192.81 TiB
967.88 TiB
20.7%
6
238.59 TiB
1.41 PiB
30.89%
7
87.03 TiB
615.53 TiB
13.16%
8
53.13 TiB
425 TiB
9.09%
9
43.91 TiB
395.16 TiB
8.45%
1.03 PiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
No results.