Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

Xuet

Client ID: f03139932

GitHubView application on GitHubPulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

202.28 TiB

Allocated DataCap

4 PiB
Report Detail
Report 44834 from 2025-05-18 03:16

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
4 issues
Number of providers: 35
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
f010202
Dallas, Texas, US
93.75 TiB
0.90%
0.00%
Not reporting
40378
72.06%
72.06%
f01081394
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
411.97 TiB
3.95%
2.97%
Not reporting
84246
2.47%
2.47%
f01081419
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
5 TiB
0.05%
0.00%
Not reporting
160
0.00%
0.00%
f01083919
London, England, GB
24.31 TiB
0.23%
0.00%
OK
38382
0.00%
0.00%
f01083931
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
307.5 TiB
2.95%
1.26%
Not reporting
54937
0.00%
0.00%
f01083939
Montréal, Quebec, CA
823.25 TiB
7.89%
1.30%
OK
221258
0.55%
0.00%
f01083949
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
831.38 TiB
7.97%
2.23%
Not reporting
218139
4.27%
4.27%
f01084149
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
3.34 TiB
0.03%
0.00%
Not reporting
107
0.00%
0.00%
f01106668
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
650.09 TiB
6.23%
1.88%
OK
165540
78.63%
78.63%
f01315096
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
609.91 TiB
5.85%
1.94%
OK
223417
74.64%
74.64%
f01518369
San Jose, California, US
477.09 TiB
4.57%
0.02%
OK
205128
32.60%
32.60%
f01889668
San Jose, California, US
476 TiB
4.56%
0.19%
OK
281151
39.72%
39.72%
f01928097
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
180.38 TiB
1.73%
2.79%
Not reporting
71395
0.00%
0.00%
f02013352
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
51.81 TiB
0.50%
0.00%
OK
31840
0.00%
0.00%
f03055005
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
550.56 TiB
5.28%
1.72%
OK
265222
0.00%
0.00%
f03055018
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
514.75 TiB
4.93%
0.58%
OK
229954
72.97%
72.97%
f03055029
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
501.5 TiB
4.81%
1.23%
OK
231243
70.83%
70.83%
f03091739
Dallas, Texas, US
187.47 TiB
1.80%
0.00%
OK
56092
73.64%
73.64%
f03144037
Paripark, Seoul, KR
183.59 TiB
1.76%
0.00%
OK
131157
70.96%
70.96%
f03148356
Ōi, Saitama, JP
184.66 TiB
1.77%
0.00%
OK
74227
71.27%
71.27%
f03151449
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
267.5 TiB
2.56%
2.08%
Not reporting
93607
70.22%
70.22%
f03151456
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
261.75 TiB
2.51%
2.24%
Yes(16653 claims)
82050
75.29%
75.29%
f03156617
Sydney, New South Wales, AU
185.09 TiB
1.77%
0.00%
Not reporting
74384
71.07%
71.07%
f03173127
Dallas, Texas, US
31.25 TiB
0.30%
0.00%
OK
69736
71.84%
71.84%
f03178077
Manila, Metro Manila, PH
241.56 TiB
2.32%
2.59%
Yes(35700 claims)
75296
0.00%
0.00%
f03178144
Manila, Metro Manila, PH
241.91 TiB
2.32%
2.48%
OK
75256
2.01%
2.01%
f03179570
Singapore, Singapore, SG
158.66 TiB
1.52%
3.51%
OK
108085
0.00%
0.00%
f03179572
San Jose, California, US
189.59 TiB
1.82%
3.30%
OK
77933
30.82%
30.82%
f03188440
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
62.19 TiB
0.60%
0.00%
Not reporting
126908
0.00%
0.00%
f03190614
Dubai, Dubai, AE
61.81 TiB
0.59%
0.00%
OK
126265
0.00%
0.00%
f03190616
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
61.44 TiB
0.59%
0.00%
OK
126419
0.00%
0.00%
f03214937
San Jose, California, US
192.75 TiB
1.85%
3.23%
OK
78067
30.30%
30.30%
f03277453
Petaling Jaya, Selangor, MY
11.13 TiB
0.11%
0.00%
OK
68011
83.39%
83.39%
f03300963
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
571.88 TiB
5.48%
2.19%
OK
153780
1.05%
1.05%
f0870558
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
824.78 TiB
7.91%
0.76%
OK
184209
50.60%
50.60%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
Healthy
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
192.94 TiB
195 TiB
1.86%
2
81.72 TiB
167.88 TiB
1.6%
3
255.41 TiB
774.69 TiB
7.42%
4
186.25 TiB
755.78 TiB
7.24%
5
197.88 TiB
1003.84 TiB
9.62%
6
281.63 TiB
1.68 PiB
16.5%
7
270.47 TiB
1.87 PiB
18.35%
8
182.28 TiB
1.44 PiB
14.1%
9
119.25 TiB
1.05 PiB
10.34%
10
67.63 TiB
690.41 TiB
6.61%
11
57.22 TiB
657.72 TiB
6.3%
1.85 PiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
No results.