Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

Xuet

Client ID: f03139932

GitHubView application on GitHubPulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

202.28 TiB

Allocated DataCap

4 PiB
Report Detail
Report 43710 from 2025-05-15 03:19

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
4 issues
Number of providers: 32
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
f010202
Dallas, Texas, US
93.75 TiB
0.91%
0.00%
Not reporting
40378
31.49%
31.49%
f01081394
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
411.97 TiB
3.98%
2.97%
Not reporting
81082
0.00%
0.00%
f01083919
London, England, GB
24.28 TiB
0.23%
0.00%
Not reporting
31620
0.00%
0.00%
f01083931
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
307.5 TiB
2.97%
1.26%
Not reporting
54937
0.00%
0.00%
f01083939
Montréal, Quebec, CA
803.75 TiB
7.77%
1.32%
OK
213282
0.00%
0.00%
f01083949
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
812.81 TiB
7.85%
2.28%
Not reporting
210659
0.00%
0.00%
f01106668
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
650.09 TiB
6.28%
1.88%
OK
165540
0.00%
0.00%
f01315096
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
609.91 TiB
5.89%
1.94%
OK
223417
1.62%
1.62%
f01518369
San Jose, California, US
477.09 TiB
4.61%
0.02%
OK
203438
12.96%
12.96%
f01889668
San Jose, California, US
476 TiB
4.60%
0.19%
OK
279363
0.07%
0.07%
f01928097
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
180.38 TiB
1.74%
2.79%
Not reporting
71395
0.00%
0.00%
f02013352
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
51.81 TiB
0.50%
0.00%
OK
31840
0.00%
0.00%
f03055005
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
550.56 TiB
5.32%
1.72%
OK
265221
0.00%
0.00%
f03055018
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
514.75 TiB
4.97%
0.58%
OK
224432
17.16%
17.16%
f03055029
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
501.5 TiB
4.85%
1.23%
OK
231243
15.86%
15.86%
f03091739
Dallas, Texas, US
187.47 TiB
1.81%
0.00%
OK
56092
0.00%
0.00%
f03144037
Paripark, Seoul, KR
183.59 TiB
1.77%
0.00%
OK
131157
0.00%
0.00%
f03148356
Ōi, Saitama, JP
184.66 TiB
1.78%
0.00%
OK
74227
0.36%
0.00%
f03151449
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
267.5 TiB
2.58%
2.08%
Not reporting
93607
0.00%
0.00%
f03151456
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
261.75 TiB
2.53%
2.24%
Yes(16653 claims)
82050
0.00%
0.00%
f03156617
Sydney, New South Wales, AU
185.09 TiB
1.79%
0.00%
Not reporting
74384
21.39%
21.39%
f03173127
Dallas, Texas, US
31.25 TiB
0.30%
0.00%
OK
69736
0.00%
0.00%
f03178077
Manila, Metro Manila, PH
241.56 TiB
2.33%
2.59%
Yes(35700 claims)
75296
0.00%
0.00%
f03178144
Manila, Metro Manila, PH
241.91 TiB
2.34%
2.48%
Not reporting
75256
0.00%
0.00%
f03179570
Singapore, Singapore, SG
158.66 TiB
1.53%
3.51%
OK
108085
0.00%
0.00%
f03179572
San Jose, California, US
189.59 TiB
1.83%
3.30%
OK
77933
0.00%
0.00%
f03188440
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
62.19 TiB
0.60%
0.00%
Not reporting
126908
0.00%
0.00%
f03190614
Dubai, Dubai, AE
61.81 TiB
0.60%
0.00%
OK
126265
0.00%
0.00%
f03190616
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
61.44 TiB
0.59%
0.00%
OK
126419
0.00%
0.00%
f03214937
San Jose, California, US
192.75 TiB
1.86%
3.23%
OK
78067
0.00%
0.00%
f03300963
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
571.88 TiB
5.53%
2.19%
OK
153780
0.00%
0.00%
f0870558
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
799.66 TiB
7.73%
0.78%
OK
178015
15.93%
15.93%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
Healthy
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
185.78 TiB
187.84 TiB
1.81%
2
79.81 TiB
164.06 TiB
1.58%
3
255.03 TiB
773.56 TiB
7.47%
4
182.16 TiB
739.47 TiB
7.14%
5
192.38 TiB
976.59 TiB
9.43%
6
282.03 TiB
1.68 PiB
16.66%
7
269.66 TiB
1.86 PiB
18.44%
8
180.06 TiB
1.42 PiB
14.04%
9
119.34 TiB
1.05 PiB
10.43%
10
66.97 TiB
683.78 TiB
6.6%
11
57.22 TiB
657.72 TiB
6.35%
1.83 PiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
No results.