DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 42962

Client ID: f03139932

Report Detail
Report 42962 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Activity status not available

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
4 issues
Number of providers: 32
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
HTTP Retrievability
RPA
Piece URL
f010202
Dallas, Texas, US
93.75 TiB
0.93%
0.00%
Not reporting
39789
32.16%
0.00%
f01081394
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
411.97 TiB
4.07%
2.97%
Not reporting
46492
0.00%
0.00%
f01083919
London, England, GB
24.28 TiB
0.24%
0.00%
Not reporting
15057
0.00%
0.00%
f01083931
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
307.5 TiB
3.04%
1.26%
Not reporting
46025
0.00%
0.00%
f01083939
Montréal, Quebec, CA
717.13 TiB
7.08%
1.06%
OK
162798
0.00%
0.00%
f01083949
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
734.38 TiB
7.25%
1.67%
Not reporting
152403
0.00%
0.00%
f01106668
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
650.09 TiB
6.42%
1.88%
OK
154589
0.00%
0.00%
f01315096
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
609.91 TiB
6.02%
1.94%
OK
197211
1.77%
0.00%
f01518369
San Jose, California, US
477.09 TiB
4.71%
0.02%
OK
187449
14.39%
0.00%
f01889668
San Jose, California, US
476 TiB
4.70%
0.19%
OK
263331
0.08%
0.00%
f01928097
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
180.38 TiB
1.78%
2.79%
Not reporting
49457
0.00%
0.00%
f02013352
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
51.81 TiB
0.51%
0.00%
OK
31829
0.00%
0.00%
f03055005
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
550.56 TiB
5.44%
1.72%
OK
219666
0.00%
0.00%
f03055018
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
514.75 TiB
5.08%
0.58%
OK
213683
18.14%
0.00%
f03055029
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
501.5 TiB
4.95%
1.23%
OK
208725
17.63%
0.00%
f03091739
Dallas, Texas, US
187.47 TiB
1.85%
0.00%
OK
56092
0.00%
0.00%
f03144037
Paripark, Seoul, KR
183.59 TiB
1.81%
0.00%
OK
131157
0.00%
0.00%
f03148356
Ōi, Saitama, JP
184.66 TiB
1.82%
0.00%
OK
74227
0.00%
0.00%
f03151449
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
267.5 TiB
2.64%
2.08%
Not reporting
92143
0.00%
0.00%
f03151456
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
261.75 TiB
2.58%
2.24%
Yes(16653 claims)
80983
0.00%
0.00%
f03156617
Sydney, New South Wales, AU
185.09 TiB
1.83%
0.00%
Not reporting
74384
23.84%
0.00%
f03173127
Dallas, Texas, US
31.25 TiB
0.31%
0.00%
OK
69499
0.00%
0.00%
f03178077
Manila, Metro Manila, PH
241.56 TiB
2.39%
2.59%
OK
66121
0.00%
0.00%
f03178144
Manila, Metro Manila, PH
241.91 TiB
2.39%
2.48%
Not reporting
66499
0.00%
0.00%
f03179570
Singapore, Singapore, SG
158.66 TiB
1.57%
3.51%
OK
106881
0.00%
0.00%
f03179572
Milpitas, California, US
189.59 TiB
1.87%
3.30%
OK
77345
0.00%
0.00%
f03188440
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
62.19 TiB
0.61%
0.00%
Not reporting
126907
0.00%
0.00%
f03190614
Dubai, Dubai, AE
61.81 TiB
0.61%
0.00%
OK
126264
0.00%
0.00%
f03190616
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
61.44 TiB
0.61%
0.00%
OK
126419
0.00%
0.00%
f03214937
Milpitas, California, US
192.75 TiB
1.90%
3.23%
OK
77446
0.00%
0.00%
f03300963
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
571.88 TiB
5.65%
2.19%
OK
153780
0.00%
0.00%
f0870558
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
742.5 TiB
7.33%
0.84%
OK
168425
17.50%
0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
Healthy
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
149.97 TiB
152.03 TiB
1.5%
2
78.72 TiB
161.88 TiB
1.59%
3
259.5 TiB
787.09 TiB
7.77%
4
182.91 TiB
743.69 TiB
7.34%
5
207.5 TiB
1.03 PiB
10.44%
6
285.94 TiB
1.71 PiB
17.26%
7
251.19 TiB
1.73 PiB
17.52%
8
179 TiB
1.41 PiB
14.25%
9
110.72 TiB
999.22 TiB
9.86%
10
59.56 TiB
601.06 TiB
5.93%
11
57.22 TiB
657.72 TiB
6.49%
1.78 PiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
No results.