Allocators

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability
f010202	Dallas, Texas, US	93.75 TiB	0.96%	0.00%	Not reporting	39789	0.74%	0.74%
f01081394	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	411.97 TiB	4.20%	2.97%	Not reporting	39407	0.00%	0.00%
f01083931	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	307.5 TiB	3.14%	1.26%	Not reporting	45841	1.61%	1.61%
f01083939	Montréal, Quebec, CA	617.38 TiB	6.30%	0.72%	OK	145604	0.03%	0.00%
f01083949	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	627.88 TiB	6.41%	1.96%	Not reporting	135961	0.00%	0.00%
f01106668	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	650.09 TiB	6.64%	1.88%	OK	154588	1.06%	1.06%
f01315096	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	609.88 TiB	6.22%	1.94%	OK	197206	0.85%	0.85%
f01518369	San Jose, California, US	477.09 TiB	4.87%	0.02%	OK	183892	0.40%	0.40%
f01889668	San Jose, California, US	476 TiB	4.86%	0.19%	OK	259625	0.49%	0.49%
f01928097	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	180.38 TiB	1.84%	2.79%	Not reporting	49457	0.00%	0.00%
f02013352	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	51.81 TiB	0.53%	0.00%	OK	31829	0.00%	0.00%
f03055005	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	543.63 TiB	5.55%	1.72%	OK	209897	0.51%	0.51%
f03055018	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	514.31 TiB	5.25%	0.58%	OK	213573	0.74%	0.74%
f03055029	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	500.34 TiB	5.11%	1.24%	OK	208020	1.21%	1.21%
f03091739	Dallas, Texas, US	187.47 TiB	1.91%	0.00%	Not reporting	56092	0.47%	0.47%
f03144037	Paripark, Seoul, KR	183.59 TiB	1.87%	0.00%	Not reporting	131157	0.49%	0.49%
f03148356	Ōi, Saitama, JP	184.66 TiB	1.88%	0.00%	Not reporting	74227	0.94%	0.94%
f03151449	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	267.5 TiB	2.73%	2.08%	Not reporting	92143	0.00%	0.00%
f03151456	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	261.75 TiB	2.67%	2.24%	Not reporting	80983	0.69%	0.69%
f03156617	Sydney, New South Wales, AU	185.09 TiB	1.89%	0.00%	Not reporting	74384	0.81%	0.81%
f03173127	Dallas, Texas, US	31.25 TiB	0.32%	0.00%	OK	69499	0.81%	0.81%
f03178077	Manila, Metro Manila, PH	241.56 TiB	2.47%	2.59%	OK	65992	0.00%	0.00%
f03178144	Manila, Metro Manila, PH	241.91 TiB	2.47%	2.48%	Not reporting	66340	0.00%	0.00%
f03179570	Singapore, Singapore, SG	158.66 TiB	1.62%	3.51%	OK	106881	0.43%	0.43%
f03179572	Milpitas, California, US	189.59 TiB	1.94%	3.30%	OK	77345	0.42%	0.42%
f03188440	Vancouver, British Columbia, CA	62.19 TiB	0.63%	0.00%	Not reporting	126907	0.00%	0.00%
f03190614	Dubai, Dubai, AE	61.81 TiB	0.63%	0.00%	OK	126264	0.00%	0.00%
f03190616	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	61.44 TiB	0.63%	0.00%	OK	126419	0.00%	0.00%
f03214937	Milpitas, California, US	192.75 TiB	1.97%	3.23%	OK	77446	0.67%	0.67%
f03300963	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	571.88 TiB	5.84%	2.19%	OK	153780	0.02%	0.02%
f0870558	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	652.44 TiB	6.66%	0.96%	OK	156535	1.06%	1.06%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

Healthy

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	57.06 TiB	59.13 TiB	0.6%
2	65.09 TiB	134.63 TiB	1.37%
3	263.56 TiB	799.66 TiB	8.16%
4	195.56 TiB	794.88 TiB	8.11%
5	190.81 TiB	973.31 TiB	9.93%
6	290.81 TiB	1.74 PiB	18.15%
7	279.78 TiB	1.93 PiB	20.17%
8	224.38 TiB	1.76 PiB	18.41%
9	84.84 TiB	765.91 TiB	7.81%
10	5 TiB	52.56 TiB	0.53%
11	57.22 TiB	657.72 TiB	6.71%
	1.67 PiB Total

Low provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.