Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

Xuet

Client ID: f03139932

GitHubView application on GitHubPulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

202.28 TiB

Allocated DataCap

4 PiB
Report Detail
Report 30747 from 2025-04-03 05:02

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
3 issues
Number of providers: 31
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
f010202
Dallas, Texas, US
93.75 TiB
1.05%
0.00%
Not reporting
39789
77.24%
0.00%
f01081394
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
91.06 TiB
1.02%
0.00%
Not reporting
2914
0.00%
0.00%
f01083931
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
189.81 TiB
2.14%
2.04%
Not reporting
34159
85.42%
0.00%
f01083939
Montréal, Quebec, CA
617.25 TiB
6.94%
0.72%
OK
107416
0.42%
0.00%
f01083949
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
615.53 TiB
6.92%
0.00%
Not reporting
83261
16.70%
0.00%
f01106668
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
650.09 TiB
7.31%
1.88%
OK
154587
75.65%
0.00%
f01315096
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
609.88 TiB
6.86%
1.94%
OK
197206
81.61%
0.00%
f01518369
San Jose, California, US
353.84 TiB
3.98%
0.03%
OK
175210
41.38%
0.00%
f01889668
San Jose, California, US
352.34 TiB
3.96%
0.00%
OK
250816
46.91%
0.00%
f01928097
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
180.38 TiB
2.03%
2.79%
Not reporting
49457
0.00%
0.00%
f02013352
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
51.81 TiB
0.58%
0.00%
OK
31829
0.00%
0.00%
f03055005
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
543.63 TiB
6.12%
1.72%
OK
209897
91.44%
0.00%
f03055018
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
468.16 TiB
5.27%
0.63%
OK
191236
94.82%
0.00%
f03055029
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
475.16 TiB
5.35%
1.30%
OK
200010
92.05%
0.00%
f03091739
Dallas, Texas, US
187.47 TiB
2.11%
0.00%
Not reporting
56092
77.10%
0.00%
f03144037
Paripark, Seoul, KR
183.59 TiB
2.07%
0.00%
Not reporting
131157
74.18%
0.00%
f03148356
Ōi, Saitama, JP
184.66 TiB
2.08%
0.00%
Not reporting
74227
76.62%
0.00%
f03151449
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
267.5 TiB
3.01%
2.08%
Not reporting
92143
8.79%
0.00%
f03151456
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
261.75 TiB
2.94%
2.24%
Not reporting
80983
16.13%
0.00%
f03156617
Sydney, New South Wales, AU
185.09 TiB
2.08%
0.00%
Not reporting
74384
76.85%
0.00%
f03173127
Dallas, Texas, US
31.25 TiB
0.35%
0.00%
OK
69499
76.44%
0.00%
f03178077
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
241.56 TiB
2.72%
2.59%
Not reporting
59998
0.00%
0.00%
f03178144
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
241.91 TiB
2.72%
2.48%
Not reporting
60162
0.00%
0.00%
f03179570
Singapore, Singapore, SG
158.66 TiB
1.78%
3.51%
OK
106881
45.15%
0.00%
f03179572
San Jose, California, US
189.59 TiB
2.13%
3.30%
OK
77345
64.65%
0.00%
f03188440
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
62.19 TiB
0.70%
0.00%
Not reporting
126907
0.00%
0.00%
f03190614
Dubai, Dubai, AE
61.81 TiB
0.70%
0.00%
OK
126264
0.00%
0.00%
f03190616
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
61.44 TiB
0.69%
0.00%
OK
126419
0.00%
0.00%
f03214937
San Jose, California, US
192.75 TiB
2.17%
3.23%
OK
77446
60.82%
0.00%
f03300963
Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN
571.88 TiB
6.43%
2.19%
OK
153780
1.19%
0.00%
f0870558
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
513.47 TiB
5.78%
1.22%
OK
137990
69.54%
0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
Healthy
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
79.31 TiB
81.44 TiB
0.91%
2
228.72 TiB
463.88 TiB
5.21%
3
333.38 TiB
1010.78 TiB
11.37%
4
94.72 TiB
390.47 TiB
4.39%
5
160.59 TiB
818.16 TiB
9.2%
6
235.78 TiB
1.4 PiB
16.12%
7
246.66 TiB
1.7 PiB
19.54%
8
183.78 TiB
1.44 PiB
16.62%
9
84.84 TiB
765.91 TiB
8.61%
10
5 TiB
52.56 TiB
0.59%
11
57.22 TiB
657.72 TiB
7.39%
1.67 PiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
No results.