Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

USANASA

Client ID: f03139573

GitHubView application on GitHubPulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

554.66 TiB

Allocated DataCap

9 PiB
Propose a Dashboard
Report Detail
Report 19532 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Activity status not available

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
3 issues
Number of providers: 23
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
RPA
f01083939
Montréal, Quebec, CA
176.13 TiB
3.18%
0.00%
OK
51614
37.76%
0.00%
0.00%
f01083949
Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN
179.56 TiB
3.24%
0.00%
OK
54314
2.10%
0.00%
0.00%
f01106668
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
500.34 TiB
9.04%
2.50%
OK
119789
68.43%
0.00%
0.00%
f01315096
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
503.53 TiB
9.10%
2.74%
OK
155016
81.76%
0.00%
0.00%
f01518369
San Jose, California, US
362.38 TiB
6.55%
0.76%
OK
134869
34.46%
0.00%
0.00%
f01889668
San Jose, California, US
387.47 TiB
7.00%
1.58%
OK
212011
38.70%
0.00%
0.00%
f02199999
Singapore, Singapore, SG
94.5 TiB
1.71%
0.86%
Not reporting
70600
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03055005
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
389.59 TiB
7.04%
4.80%
OK
209897
88.85%
0.00%
0.00%
f03055018
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
394.94 TiB
7.13%
2.17%
OK
191236
82.35%
0.00%
0.00%
f03055029
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
376.91 TiB
6.81%
2.36%
OK
200010
81.64%
0.00%
0.00%
f03091739
Dallas, Texas, US
187.5 TiB
3.39%
0.00%
Not reporting
56092
72.25%
0.00%
0.00%
f03144037
Paripark, Seoul, KR
180.25 TiB
3.26%
0.00%
Not reporting
131157
71.50%
0.00%
0.00%
f03151449
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
97.67 TiB
1.76%
0.00%
Not reporting
92143
15.72%
0.00%
0.00%
f03151456
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
61.31 TiB
1.11%
0.00%
Not reporting
80983
21.34%
0.00%
0.00%
f03178077
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
97.92 TiB
1.77%
0.00%
Not reporting
59998
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03178144
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
97.52 TiB
1.76%
0.00%
Not reporting
60162
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03179555
Singapore, Singapore, SG
95.73 TiB
1.73%
0.00%
OK
45563
56.46%
0.00%
0.00%
f03179570
Singapore, Singapore, SG
97.73 TiB
1.77%
0.00%
OK
106881
37.22%
0.00%
0.00%
f03179572
San Jose, California, US
97.95 TiB
1.77%
0.00%
OK
77345
48.13%
0.00%
0.00%
f03214937
San Jose, California, US
96.98 TiB
1.75%
0.00%
OK
77446
49.54%
0.00%
0.00%
f03229932
Seoul, Seoul, KR
98.2 TiB
1.77%
0.00%
OK
77617
27.58%
0.00%
0.00%
f03300963
Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN
615.47 TiB
11.12%
3.74%
OK
153780
0.12%
0.00%
0.00%
f0870558
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
345.78 TiB
6.25%
2.06%
OK
102805
70.05%
0.00%
0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
Healthy
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
160 GiB
160 GiB
0%
2
26.56 TiB
56.66 TiB
1.02%
3
70.94 TiB
224.59 TiB
4.05%
4
40.75 TiB
165.53 TiB
2.99%
5
166.84 TiB
841.69 TiB
15.2%
6
190.53 TiB
1.14 PiB
21.1%
7
214.53 TiB
1.51 PiB
27.84%
8
90.42 TiB
732.19 TiB
13.22%
9
33.91 TiB
308.53 TiB
5.57%
10
49.66 TiB
496.56 TiB
8.97%
884.3 TiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
No results.