f01081394
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
399.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.15%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
91471
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
5.01 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
399.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.15%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
91471
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Montréal, Quebec, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
742.09 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.71%
Deal Percentage
4.24% / 31.47 TiB
Duplication
262897
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
755.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.85%
Deal Percentage
5.57% / 42.09 TiB
Duplication
263025
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
San Jose, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
853.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.87%
Deal Percentage
12.73% / 108.72 TiB
Duplication
338184
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
933.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.7%
Deal Percentage
21.68% / 202.44 TiB
Duplication
433076
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
San Jose, California, US
564.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.86%
Deal Percentage
0.65% / 3.69 TiB
Duplication
358106
Total Claims
28%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
San Jose, California, US
596.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.2%
Deal Percentage
1.65% / 9.84 TiB
Duplication
531351
Total Claims
21%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
188.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.96%
Deal Percentage
50.36% / 95.06 TiB
Duplication
91077
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
799.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.31%
Deal Percentage
2.46% / 19.66 TiB
Duplication
373449
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
613.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.37%
Deal Percentage
2.76% / 16.91 TiB
Duplication
421661
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
603.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.27%
Deal Percentage
2.38% / 14.38 TiB
Duplication
434233
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
187.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.95%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
56092
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Gangseo-gu, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
180.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.87%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
131157
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
101.64 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.06%
Deal Percentage
1.94% / 1.97 TiB
Duplication
93760
Total Claims
60%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
62.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.65%
Deal Percentage
1.29% / 832 GiB
Duplication
82085
Total Claims
77%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Manila, National Capital Region, PH
Sample Piece URL not found
101.39 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.05%
Deal Percentage
1.7% / 1.72 TiB
Duplication
75498
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Manila, National Capital Region, PH
Sample Piece URL not found
102.27 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.06%
Deal Percentage
2.29% / 2.34 TiB
Duplication
75505
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
98.67 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.02%
Deal Percentage
1.46% / 1.44 TiB
Duplication
46139
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
101.11 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.05%
Deal Percentage
1.67% / 1.69 TiB
Duplication
108883
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
101.8 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.06%
Deal Percentage
1.84% / 1.88 TiB
Duplication
78390
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
102.17 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.06%
Deal Percentage
2.51% / 2.56 TiB
Duplication
78543
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
101.23 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.05%
Deal Percentage
1.45% / 1.47 TiB
Duplication
79161
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
615.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.39%
Deal Percentage
3.74% / 23 TiB
Duplication
153780
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
719.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.47%
Deal Percentage
4.06% / 29.22 TiB
Duplication
321440
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 67.19 TiB | 214.16 TiB | 2.22% |
| 4 | 6.81 TiB | 28.47 TiB | 0.29% |
| 5 | 409.84 TiB | 2.08 PiB | 22.06% |
| 10 | 58.97 TiB | 599.5 TiB | 6.22% |
| 6 | 220.38 TiB | 1.33 PiB | 14.14% |
| 9 | 172.75 TiB | 1.53 PiB | 16.26% |
| 2 | 26.41 TiB | 56.56 TiB | 0.58% |
| 7 | 280.81 TiB | 2.24 PiB | 23.83% |
| 8 | 156.61 TiB | 1.35 PiB | 14.35% |
| 1 | 160 GiB | 160 GiB | 0% |
| 1.37 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||