f01106668
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
641.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.73%
Deal Percentage
12.79% / 82.06 TiB
Duplication
312054
Total Claims
57%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
3.25 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
641.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.73%
Deal Percentage
12.79% / 82.06 TiB
Duplication
312054
Total Claims
57%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
554.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.13%
Deal Percentage
30.71% / 170.16 TiB
Duplication
380929
Total Claims
58%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
San Jose, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
190.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.48%
Deal Percentage
1.58% / 3 TiB
Duplication
304757
Total Claims
34%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
San Jose, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
188.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.45%
Deal Percentage
0.63% / 1.19 TiB
Duplication
380335
Total Claims
30%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
183.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.36%
Deal Percentage
49.74% / 91.47 TiB
Duplication
91077
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
567.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.37%
Deal Percentage
1.39% / 7.91 TiB
Duplication
370826
Total Claims
88%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
490.41 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.97%
Deal Percentage
1.89% / 9.28 TiB
Duplication
356999
Total Claims
87%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
566 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.35%
Deal Percentage
1.21% / 6.84 TiB
Duplication
353201
Total Claims
85%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
171.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.14%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75026
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
140.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.57%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
74995
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
187.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.43%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75017
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
187.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.43%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75455
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
93.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.7%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
91347
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
93.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.71%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
56092
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Gangseo-gu, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
92.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.69%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
131157
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Ōi, Saitama, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
93.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.71%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
74227
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Sydney, New South Wales, AU
Sample Piece URL not found
93.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.71%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
74384
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
17.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.32%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
108874
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
414.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.58%
Deal Percentage
6.56% / 27.19 TiB
Duplication
153780
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
501.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.17%
Deal Percentage
2.16% / 10.84 TiB
Duplication
292906
Total Claims
59%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 32 GiB | 64 GiB | 0% |
| 3 | 94.06 TiB | 289.47 TiB | 5.29% |
| 5 | 110 TiB | 732.59 TiB | 13.39% |
| 8 | 203.09 TiB | 1.6 PiB | 29.86% |
| 6 | 383.09 TiB | 2.43 PiB | 45.56% |
| 4 | 15.91 TiB | 79 TiB | 1.44% |
| 7 | 34.34 TiB | 242.5 TiB | 4.43% |
| 840.53 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||