Report 175876

Client ID: f03070890

Report Detail

Report 175876 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

6.05 days

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

8 issues

Number of providers: 35

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	Total claims	RPA
f010202	Dallas, Texas, US	100 TiB	0.01%	0%	40378	N/A
f01081419	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	1.2 PiB	0.1%	58.32%	273190	N/A
f01082868	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	6.25 TiB	0%	0%	46648	N/A
f01083931	Changsha, Hunan, CN	161.47 TiB	0.01%	0%	295953	N/A
f01084149	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	951.34 TiB	0.08%	81.16%	268283	N/A
f014686	Montréal, Quebec, CA	518.22 TiB	0.04%	0%	120321	N/A
f014699	Dallas, Texas, US	504.09 TiB	0.04%	0%	120581	N/A
f01674133	Osaka, Osaka, JP	15 TiB	0%	0%	55492	N/A
f02837684	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	149.91 TiB	0.01%	0%	60564	N/A
f02953066	Washington, District of Columbia, US	148.72 TiB	0.01%	0%	60485	N/A
f02956073	Singapore, Singapore, SG	109.84 TiB	0.01%	0%	48853	N/A
f03028412	Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN	98.91 TiB	0.01%	0%	24390	N/A
f03080852	Toronto, Ontario, CA	339 TiB	0.03%	0%	129240	N/A
f03080854	Piscataway, New Jersey, US	299.63 TiB	0.02%	0%	92957	N/A
f03091738	Dallas, Texas, US	892.03 TiB	0.07%	0%	91347	N/A
f03148356	Ōi, Saitama, JP	198.84 TiB	0.02%	0%	74227	N/A
f03156617	Sydney, New South Wales, AU	199.97 TiB	0.02%	0%	74384	N/A
f03173124	Seoul, Seoul, KR	444.41 TiB	0.04%	0%	106159	N/A
f03188440	Vancouver, British Columbia, CA	298.06 TiB	0.02%	0%	126908	N/A
f03188443	Singapore, Singapore, SG	447.41 TiB	0.04%	0%	106783	N/A
f03190614	Dubai, Dubai, AE	386.03 TiB	0.03%	0%	126265	N/A
f03190616	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	297 TiB	0.02%	0%	126419	N/A
f03196399	Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, MY	78.28 TiB	0.01%	0%	111216	N/A
f03196401	Osaka, Osaka, JP	78.88 TiB	0.01%	0%	110747	N/A
f03201941	Toronto, Ontario, CA	499.84 TiB	0.04%	0%	83067	N/A
f03228953	Bangkok, Bangkok, TH	556.63 TiB	0.05%	0%	82992	N/A
f03251827	Singapore, Singapore, SG	78.47 TiB	0.01%	0%	50479	N/A
f03251828	Dallas, Texas, US	80 TiB	0.01%	0%	51203	N/A
f03254061	Montréal, Quebec, CA	596.91 TiB	0.05%	0%	108784	N/A
f03254063	Piscataway, New Jersey, US	597.5 TiB	0.05%	0%	109098	N/A
f03254125	Dallas, Texas, US	339.38 TiB	0.03%	0%	86125	N/A
f03259560	Osaka, Osaka, JP	303.59 TiB	0.03%	0%	84805	N/A
f03265465	Manila, National Capital Region, PH	678.47 TiB	0.06%	0%	119516	N/A
f03275720	Dallas, Texas, US	326.81 TiB	0.03%	0%	128316	N/A
f03513103	Gangseo-gu, Seoul, KR	8.38 TiB	0%	0%	56440	N/A

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

3 issues

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
8	263.56 TiB	2.06 PiB	17.54%
6	33.94 TiB	203.63 TiB	1.69%
7	17.28 TiB	120.97 TiB	1%
4	32.47 TiB	129.88 TiB	1.08%
11	66.06 TiB	726.69 TiB	6.04%
9	162.25 TiB	1.43 PiB	12.14%
10	399.13 TiB	3.9 PiB	33.2%
5	127.16 TiB	635.78 TiB	5.28%
3	39.66 TiB	118.97 TiB	0.98%
2	272.28 TiB	1.89 PiB	16.09%
1	489.88 TiB	589.88 TiB	4.9%
	1.86 PiB Total

Wrong provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total Deals Affected	Unique CIDs
f03069956	27.69 TiB	886
f03071549	32 GiB	1
f03079988	30.5 TiB	976
f03226921	1.45 PiB	6800
f03235906	319.5 TiB	3200
f03239767	882.72 TiB	3095
f03241844	147.06 TiB	800
f03282090	158.09 TiB	5059
f03282131	341.91 TiB	5408
f03519816	233.19 TiB	7462
f03602023	827.78 TiB	5119