f01106668
San Jose, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
200 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.53%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
338184
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
1.43 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
San Jose, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
200 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.53%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
338184
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
200 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.53%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
433076
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
San Jose, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
200 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.53%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
358106
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10187 ms
Time to First Byte
258.82 Mbps
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
80 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.01%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
164687
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chongqing, Chongqing, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
159.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.02%
Deal Percentage
49.53% / 78.88 TiB
Duplication
15186
Total Claims
100%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
San Jose, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
200 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.53%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
531351
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10197 ms
Time to First Byte
253.49 Mbps
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
155.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.97%
Deal Percentage
0.54% / 864 GiB
Duplication
21548
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
367.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.66%
Deal Percentage
49.38% / 181.69 TiB
Duplication
91077
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
131.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.66%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 32 GiB
Duplication
86505
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
217.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.76%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
112304
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
199.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.52%
Deal Percentage
0.05% / 96 GiB
Duplication
111740
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
42.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.54%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
97015
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
93.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.19%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
48483
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
140.41 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.78%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
60564
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Wuhan, Hubei, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
151.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.92%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
21327
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Sample Piece URL not found
137.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.74%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
60485
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
93.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.19%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
48853
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
58.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.74%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
118252
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
62.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.79%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
115021
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
53.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.68%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
116134
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
375 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.75%
Deal Percentage
50% / 187.5 TiB
Duplication
161045
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Gangseo-gu, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
93.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.18%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
59568
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
199.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.53%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
373449
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
40.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.51%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
421661
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
199.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.53%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
434233
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
187.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.37%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75026
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
186.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.36%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
74995
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
187.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.37%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75017
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
185.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.35%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75455
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
93.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.19%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
75297
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
557.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.06%
Deal Percentage
49.76% / 277.41 TiB
Duplication
129240
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Piscataway, New Jersey, US
Sample Piece URL not found
280.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.55%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
92957
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Dallas, Texas, US
Sample Piece URL not found
93 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.18%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
91347
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
522.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.62%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
131520
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Gangseo-gu, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
91.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.16%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
131157
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Chengdu, Sichuan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
252.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.19%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
112248
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
91.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.16%
Deal Percentage
1.7% / 1.56 TiB
Duplication
119916
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
27.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.35%
Deal Percentage
3.07% / 864 GiB
Duplication
81201
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
500.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.34%
Deal Percentage
0.64% / 3.19 TiB
Duplication
221695
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
586.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.43%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 32 GiB
Duplication
132508
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
199.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.53%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
321440
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | 121.47 TiB | 1.5 PiB | 19.44% |
| 13 | 42.56 TiB | 679.31 TiB | 8.6% |
| 3 | 288.72 TiB | 933.16 TiB | 11.81% |
| 2 | 95.75 TiB | 200.34 TiB | 2.53% |
| 8 | 53.97 TiB | 432.94 TiB | 5.48% |
| 12 | 26.66 TiB | 398.47 TiB | 5.04% |
| 5 | 26.38 TiB | 132.22 TiB | 1.67% |
| 4 | 168.44 TiB | 861.72 TiB | 10.9% |
| 9 | 36.22 TiB | 327.25 TiB | 4.14% |
| 1 | 91.63 TiB | 91.84 TiB | 1.16% |
| 6 | 68.13 TiB | 409.31 TiB | 5.18% |
| 14 | 18.78 TiB | 318.72 TiB | 4.03% |
| 7 | 197.03 TiB | 1.35 PiB | 17.46% |
| 10 | 19.38 TiB | 198.28 TiB | 2.51% |
| 1.23 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||