Report 175105

Client ID: f03061409

Report Detail

Report 175105 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

1.43 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

9 issues

Number of providers: 41

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	Total claims	RPA
f01315096	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	193.13 TiB	0.02%	0%	388031	N/A
f01106668	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	200 TiB	0.03%	0%	319874	N/A
f01518369	San Jose, California, US	199.88 TiB	0.03%	0%	327144	38%
f01660795	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	80 TiB	0.01%	0%	144834	N/A
f01769576	Chongqing, Chongqing, CN	80.38 TiB	0.01%	0%	9140	N/A
f01889668	San Jose, California, US	200 TiB	0.03%	0%	402731	16%
f01986236	Los Angeles, California, US	155.88 TiB	0.02%	0.54%	21548	N/A
f02199999	Singapore, Singapore, SG	367.94 TiB	0.05%	49.38%	91077	N/A
f02826007	Singapore, Singapore, SG	131.31 TiB	0.02%	0.02%	86198	N/A
f02826588	Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN	217.78 TiB	0.03%	0%	112027	N/A
f02827996	Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN	198.91 TiB	0.03%	0.05%	111370	N/A
f02828242	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	42.69 TiB	0.01%	0%	96960	N/A
f02830476	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	93.69 TiB	0.01%	0%	47689	N/A
f02837684	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	140.41 TiB	0.02%	0%	60564	N/A
f02900009	Wuhan, Hubei, CN	151.97 TiB	0.02%	0%	21327	N/A
f02953066	Washington, District of Columbia, US	137.66 TiB	0.02%	0%	60485	N/A
f02956073	Singapore, Singapore, SG	93.63 TiB	0.01%	0%	48853	N/A
f03028310	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	58.34 TiB	0.01%	0%	109187	N/A
f03028321	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	62.5 TiB	0.01%	0%	105684	N/A
f03028325	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	53.97 TiB	0.01%	0%	106640	N/A
f03028326	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	375 TiB	0.05%	50%	150257	N/A
f03044609	Gangseo-gu, Seoul, KR	93.31 TiB	0.01%	0%	59568	N/A
f03055005	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	199.97 TiB	0.03%	0%	370826	N/A
f03055018	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	40.59 TiB	0.01%	0%	356999	N/A
f03055029	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	199.47 TiB	0.03%	0%	353201	N/A
f03074583	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	187.5 TiB	0.02%	0%	75026	N/A
f03074586	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	186.34 TiB	0.02%	0%	74995	N/A
f03074587	Seoul, Seoul, KR	187.5 TiB	0.02%	0%	75017	N/A
f03074589	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	185.25 TiB	0.02%	0%	75455	N/A
f03074592	Los Angeles, California, US	93.75 TiB	0.01%	0%	75297	N/A
f03080852	Toronto, Ontario, CA	557.5 TiB	0.07%	49.76%	129240	N/A
f03080854	Piscataway, New Jersey, US	280.69 TiB	0.04%	0%	92957	N/A
f03091738	Dallas, Texas, US	93 TiB	0.01%	0%	91347	N/A
f03100004	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	522.66 TiB	0.07%	0%	131432	N/A
f03144037	Gangseo-gu, Seoul, KR	91.34 TiB	0.01%	0%	131157	N/A
f03216485	Chengdu, Sichuan, CN	252.13 TiB	0.03%	0%	112166	N/A
f03228358	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	91.72 TiB	0.01%	1.7%	119905	N/A
f03233966	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	27.5 TiB	0%	3.07%	81197	N/A
f03241837	Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN	500.88 TiB	0.06%	0.64%	221695	N/A
f03614397	Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, KR	557.41 TiB	0.07%	0%	131095	N/A
f0870558	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	199.59 TiB	0.03%	0%	318504	N/A

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

3 issues

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
11	121.47 TiB	1.5 PiB	19.72%
13	42.56 TiB	679.31 TiB	8.72%
3	264.06 TiB	830.81 TiB	10.67%
2	115.94 TiB	238.91 TiB	3.06%
8	52.69 TiB	422.72 TiB	5.43%
12	26.66 TiB	398.47 TiB	5.11%
5	26.47 TiB	132.69 TiB	1.7%
4	168.44 TiB	813 TiB	10.44%
9	36.06 TiB	325.81 TiB	4.18%
1	96.06 TiB	96.28 TiB	1.23%
6	73.66 TiB	442.5 TiB	5.68%
14	18.78 TiB	318.72 TiB	4.09%
7	192.91 TiB	1.32 PiB	17.35%
10	19.31 TiB	197.66 TiB	2.53%
	1.23 PiB Total

Wrong provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total Deals Affected	Unique CIDs
No results.