Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

TheNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Client ID: f03071549

GitHubView application on GitHubPulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

16 GiB

Allocated DataCap

2 PiB
Propose a Dashboard
Report Detail
Report 66715 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a month

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
7 issues
Number of providers: 28
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
RPA
f010202
Dallas, Texas, US
255.22 TiB
2.59%
2.04%
Not reporting
40378
68.75%
68.75%
0.00%
f01082868
Incheon, Incheon, KR
247.63 TiB
2.51%
48.32%
Not reporting
46648
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f01083931
Changsha, Hunan, CN
285.13 TiB
2.89%
11.23%
OK
179655
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f01083949
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
32 GiB
0.00%
0.00%
Not reporting
250276
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f01674133
Osaka, Osaka, JP
399.72 TiB
4.06%
0.00%
Not reporting
55492
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f02227496
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
185.25 TiB
1.88%
49.44%
OK
28370
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f02815438
Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN
196.28 TiB
1.99%
49.20%
OK
29769
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f02956073
Singapore, Singapore, SG
149.72 TiB
1.52%
0.00%
OK
48853
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03028412
Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN
149.78 TiB
1.52%
0.00%
OK
24390
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03148356
Ōi, Saitama, JP
299.72 TiB
3.04%
0.00%
OK
74227
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03156617
Sydney, New South Wales, AU
299.94 TiB
3.04%
0.00%
Not reporting
74384
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03173124
Seoul, Seoul, KR
487.59 TiB
4.95%
0.00%
OK
106159
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03188440
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
422.5 TiB
4.29%
0.00%
Not reporting
126908
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03188443
Singapore, Singapore, SG
498.72 TiB
5.06%
0.00%
OK
106783
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03190614
Dubai, Dubai, AE
393.94 TiB
4.00%
0.00%
OK
126265
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03190616
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
393.22 TiB
3.99%
0.00%
OK
126419
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03201941
Toronto, Ontario, CA
427.88 TiB
4.34%
0.00%
OK
83067
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03228953
Bangkok, Bangkok, TH
427.25 TiB
4.33%
0.00%
OK
82992
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03251827
Singapore, Singapore, SG
190.56 TiB
1.93%
0.00%
OK
50479
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03251828
Dallas, Texas, US
199.14 TiB
2.02%
0.00%
OK
51203
74.07%
74.07%
0.00%
f03254061
Montréal, Quebec, CA
591.11 TiB
6.00%
0.00%
OK
108784
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03254063
Piscataway, New Jersey, US
596.95 TiB
6.06%
0.00%
Not reporting
109098
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03254125
Dallas, Texas, US
398.78 TiB
4.05%
0.00%
OK
86125
62.34%
62.34%
0.00%
f03259560
Osaka, Osaka, JP
399.31 TiB
4.05%
0.00%
Not reporting
84805
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03265465
Manila, Metro Manila, PH
798.66 TiB
8.10%
0.00%
OK
119516
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03338189
Toronto, Ontario, CA
264.42 TiB
2.68%
0.00%
OK
87778
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03508272
Dallas, Texas, US
498.5 TiB
5.06%
0.00%
OK
43454
38.00%
38.00%
0.00%
f03513103
Paripark, Seoul, KR
399.72 TiB
4.06%
0.00%
Yes(1075 claims)
56440
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
1.54 PiB
1.54 PiB
15.96%
2
347.84 TiB
846.78 TiB
8.59%
3
1.55 TiB
4.64 TiB
0.04%
4
184.09 TiB
736.38 TiB
7.47%
5
193.45 TiB
967.27 TiB
9.81%
6
4.91 TiB
29.44 TiB
0.29%
7
95.58 TiB
669.2 TiB
6.78%
8
18.81 TiB
157.53 TiB
1.59%
9
120.47 TiB
1.06 PiB
11.02%
10
360.16 TiB
3.7 PiB
38.4%
2.83 PiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
f03069956
34.13 TiB
1092
f03070890
32 GiB
1
f03079988
32 GiB
1
f03226921
192 GiB
1
f03254504
370.13 TiB
4022
f03282090
66.81 TiB
2138
f03282131
96 GiB
1
f03519816
32 GiB
1
f03551481
254.34 TiB
4096