f01081394
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
68.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.9%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
32141
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
N/A
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Activity status not available
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
68.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.9%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
32141
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Montréal, Quebec, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
253.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
18.14%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
137529
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
261.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
18.73%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
124832
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
98.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.04%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
154588
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
74.09 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.31%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
197206
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
San Jose, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
169.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.17%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
182616
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
San Jose, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
175.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.59%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
258103
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
95.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.82%
Deal Percentage
0.03% / 32 GiB
Duplication
211379
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shanghai, Shanghai, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
99.84 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.15%
Deal Percentage
0.03% / 32 GiB
Duplication
153780
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
99.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.16%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
156535
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 14.03 TiB | 28.06 TiB | 2.01% |
| 3 | 30.66 TiB | 91.97 TiB | 6.59% |
| 6 | 57.41 TiB | 344.44 TiB | 24.68% |
| 5 | 147.75 TiB | 738.81 TiB | 52.94% |
| 4 | 47.28 TiB | 189.13 TiB | 13.55% |
| 1 | 3.03 TiB | 3.03 TiB | 0.21% |
| 300.16 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||