f01082888
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
39.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.33%
Deal Percentage
1.1% / 448 GiB
Duplication
365798
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
0.96 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
39.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.33%
Deal Percentage
1.1% / 448 GiB
Duplication
365798
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Central, Central and Western, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
214.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
17.95%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
33858
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
39.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.33%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
86198
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
39.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.32%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
112027
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
39.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.31%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
111370
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Changsha, Hunan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
40.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.39%
Deal Percentage
5.49% / 2.22 TiB
Duplication
134915
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
299.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
25.14%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
157945
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Virginia Beach, Virginia, US
Sample Piece URL not found
100 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.38%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
90554
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Virginia Beach, Virginia, US
Sample Piece URL not found
60 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.03%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
90689
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Beijing, Beijing, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
100 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.38%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
90537
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
100 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.38%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
90566
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
59.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.02%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
99720
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
60 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.03%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
100159
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 1.16 TiB | 8.16 TiB | 0.68% |
| 4 | 736 GiB | 2.88 TiB | 0.24% |
| 2 | 115.91 TiB | 231.81 TiB | 19.43% |
| 11 | 512 GiB | 5.5 TiB | 0.46% |
| 6 | 160 GiB | 960 GiB | 0.07% |
| 9 | 3 TiB | 27.03 TiB | 2.26% |
| 8 | 20.25 TiB | 162 TiB | 13.57% |
| 10 | 2.16 TiB | 21.63 TiB | 1.81% |
| 5 | 39.78 TiB | 198.94 TiB | 16.67% |
| 12 | 4.53 TiB | 54.44 TiB | 4.56% |
| 13 | 30.44 TiB | 398.09 TiB | 33.36% |
| 1 | 81.63 TiB | 81.63 TiB | 6.84% |
| 300.22 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| f03533909 | 114.78 TiB | 1264 |