f01081394
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
100 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.29%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
91471
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
44.00 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
100 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.29%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
91471
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
55.84 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.28%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
278533
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
364.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.36%
Deal Percentage
99.73% / 363.69 TiB
Duplication
59418
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
367.41 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.42%
Deal Percentage
99.73% / 366.41 TiB
Duplication
57571
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
274.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.28%
Deal Percentage
99.64% / 273.03 TiB
Duplication
121586
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Montréal, Quebec, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
387.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.88%
Deal Percentage
2.42% / 9.38 TiB
Duplication
262897
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
379.09 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.69%
Deal Percentage
2.43% / 9.22 TiB
Duplication
263025
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
54.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.25%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
278554
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
274.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.29%
Deal Percentage
99.64% / 273.47 TiB
Duplication
136770
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
546.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.53%
Deal Percentage
99.82% / 545.56 TiB
Duplication
107618
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
San Jose, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
178.09 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.08%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
338184
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
178.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.08%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
433076
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
184.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.23%
Deal Percentage
3.39% / 6.25 TiB
Duplication
373449
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
177.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.08%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
421661
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
168.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.86%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
434233
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
91.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.1%
Deal Percentage
0.82% / 768 GiB
Duplication
46139
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
65.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.5%
Deal Percentage
1.72% / 1.13 TiB
Duplication
78390
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
92.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.13%
Deal Percentage
0.57% / 544 GiB
Duplication
78543
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
74.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.7%
Deal Percentage
0.46% / 352 GiB
Duplication
79161
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
74.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.7%
Deal Percentage
0.25% / 192 GiB
Duplication
79335
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
93.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.15%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
153780
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
179.09 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.11%
Deal Percentage
0.56% / 1 TiB
Duplication
321440
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 161.09 TiB | 1.27 PiB | 29.72% |
| 1 | 32 GiB | 32 GiB | 0% |
| 4 | 24.91 TiB | 99.78 TiB | 2.28% |
| 7 | 17 TiB | 119.09 TiB | 2.73% |
| 3 | 192.53 TiB | 596.38 TiB | 13.67% |
| 2 | 4.06 TiB | 8.13 TiB | 0.18% |
| 6 | 51.38 TiB | 310.34 TiB | 7.11% |
| 5 | 21.88 TiB | 1.88 PiB | 44.26% |
| 472.88 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| f03070890 | 287.59 TiB | 3200 |