DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 198116

Client ID: f03225482

Report Detail
Report 198116 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

4.20 days

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
4 issues
Number of providers: 18

f01081394

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

199.94 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.6%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

91471

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01083939

Montréal, Quebec, CA

Sample Piece URL not found

527.75 TiB

Total Deal Size

14.79%

Deal Percentage

2.37% / 12.5 TiB

Duplication

262897

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01083949

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

537.34 TiB

Total Deal Size

15.06%

Deal Percentage

4.07% / 21.88 TiB

Duplication

263025

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01106668

San Jose, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

304.88 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.55%

Deal Percentage

0.57% / 1.75 TiB

Duplication

338184

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01315096

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

299.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.41%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

433076

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01518369

San Jose, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

100 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.8%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

358106

Total Claims

36%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01889668

San Jose, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

100 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.8%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

531351

Total Claims

22%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03055005

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

221.47 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.21%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

373449

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03055018

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

259.41 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.27%

Deal Percentage

0.06% / 160 GiB

Duplication

421661

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03055029

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

187.78 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.26%

Deal Percentage

0.35% / 672 GiB

Duplication

434233

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03151449

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

77.38 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.17%

Deal Percentage

0.65% / 512 GiB

Duplication

93760

Total Claims

69%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03151456

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

78.88 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.21%

Deal Percentage

0.95% / 768 GiB

Duplication

82085

Total Claims

64%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03178077

Manila, National Capital Region, PH

Sample Piece URL not found

77.78 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.18%

Deal Percentage

0.68% / 544 GiB

Duplication

75498

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03178144

Manila, National Capital Region, PH

Sample Piece URL not found

78.63 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.2%

Deal Percentage

0.64% / 512 GiB

Duplication

75505

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03179570

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

76.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.16%

Deal Percentage

0.89% / 704 GiB

Duplication

108883

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03179572

Los Angeles, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

78.44 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.2%

Deal Percentage

0.72% / 576 GiB

Duplication

78390

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03214937

Los Angeles, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

79.5 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.23%

Deal Percentage

2.08% / 1.66 TiB

Duplication

78543

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f0870558

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

281.16 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.88%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

321440

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
Healthy
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
2
100.28 TiB
213.06 TiB
5.97%
3
199.63 TiB
598.88 TiB
16.78%
1
128 GiB
128 GiB
0%
6
98.72 TiB
594.5 TiB
16.66%
4
101.69 TiB
419.25 TiB
11.75%
7
161.22 TiB
1.12 PiB
32.03%
5
119.59 TiB
598.56 TiB
16.77%
781.25 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.