f02002200
Xiamen, Fujian, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
384.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.34%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
92987
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10613 ms
Time to First Byte
0.68 Mbps
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
0.95 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Xiamen, Fujian, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
384.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.34%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
92987
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10613 ms
Time to First Byte
0.68 Mbps
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
379.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.17%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
101868
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10585 ms
Time to First Byte
0.18 Mbps
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
378.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.13%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
99625
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10577 ms
Time to First Byte
0.45 Mbps
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
387.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.42%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
85650
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10791 ms
Time to First Byte
0.32 Mbps
Bandwidth
Moscow, Moscow, RU
Sample Piece URL not found
151.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.46%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
163863
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10770 ms
Time to First Byte
11.91 Mbps
Bandwidth
Moscow, Moscow, RU
Sample Piece URL not found
151.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.46%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
9527
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10757 ms
Time to First Byte
6.13 Mbps
Bandwidth
Moscow, Moscow, RU
Sample Piece URL not found
395.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.66%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
17528
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10753 ms
Time to First Byte
8.36 Mbps
Bandwidth
Washington, District of Columbia, US
Sample Piece URL not found
400.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.79%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
17255
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
384.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.32%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
17158
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10650 ms
Time to First Byte
0.2 Mbps
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
382 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.25%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
16860
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10676 ms
Time to First Byte
0.24 Mbps
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 184.09 TiB | 1.44 PiB | 43.37% |
| 7 | 41.19 TiB | 288.31 TiB | 8.49% |
| 6 | 20 TiB | 120 TiB | 3.53% |
| 10 | 131.94 TiB | 1.29 PiB | 38.86% |
| 9 | 18.31 TiB | 164.81 TiB | 4.85% |
| 5 | 5 TiB | 25 TiB | 0.73% |
| 1 | 1.5 TiB | 1.5 TiB | 0.04% |
| 4 | 832 GiB | 3.25 TiB | 0.09% |
| 402.84 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||