f02002200
Xiamen, Fujian, CN
314.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.14%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
90083
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
0.95 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Xiamen, Fujian, CN
314.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.14%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
90083
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
309.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.95%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
99545
Total Claims
99%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
308.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.93%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
97344
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
314.72 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.15%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
82684
Total Claims
77%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Moscow, Moscow, RU
151.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.36%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
160101
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Moscow, Moscow, RU
Sample Piece URL not found
151.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.36%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
9527
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Moscow, Moscow, RU
Sample Piece URL not found
338.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
12%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
15702
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Washington, District of Columbia, US
339.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.02%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
15303
Total Claims
96%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
303.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.76%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
14584
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
291 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.31%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
13948
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 147.59 TiB | 1.15 PiB | 41.83% |
| 7 | 5.31 TiB | 37.19 TiB | 1.31% |
| 2 | 24.88 TiB | 49.75 TiB | 1.76% |
| 6 | 192 GiB | 1.13 TiB | 0.03% |
| 10 | 131.94 TiB | 1.29 PiB | 46.74% |
| 9 | 18.31 TiB | 164.81 TiB | 5.83% |
| 5 | 32 GiB | 160 GiB | 0% |
| 1 | 43.47 TiB | 43.47 TiB | 1.54% |
| 3 | 7.34 TiB | 22.03 TiB | 0.78% |
| 4 | 960 GiB | 3.75 TiB | 0.13% |
| 380 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||