f02002200
Xiamen, Fujian, CN
295.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.35%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
89471
Total Claims
99%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
0.95 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Xiamen, Fujian, CN
295.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.35%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
89471
Total Claims
99%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
290.28 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.16%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
98941
Total Claims
99%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
289.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.12%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
96723
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
295.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.35%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
82064
Total Claims
82%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Moscow, Moscow, RU
151.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.82%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
160101
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Moscow, Moscow, RU
Sample Piece URL not found
151.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.82%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
9527
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Moscow, Moscow, RU
Sample Piece URL not found
300.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.56%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
14490
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Washington, District of Columbia, US
301.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.6%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
14102
Total Claims
97%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
272.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.48%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
13584
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
253.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.74%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
12740
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 101.31 TiB | 810.5 TiB | 31.14% |
| 7 | 15.06 TiB | 105.44 TiB | 4.05% |
| 2 | 32 GiB | 64 GiB | 0% |
| 6 | 19.69 TiB | 118.13 TiB | 4.53% |
| 10 | 131.94 TiB | 1.29 PiB | 50.69% |
| 9 | 18.31 TiB | 164.81 TiB | 6.33% |
| 5 | 12.19 TiB | 60.94 TiB | 2.34% |
| 1 | 4.81 TiB | 4.81 TiB | 0.18% |
| 3 | 608 GiB | 1.78 TiB | 0.06% |
| 4 | 4.22 TiB | 16.88 TiB | 0.64% |
| 308.16 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||