DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 36388

Client ID: f03493328

Report Detail
Report 36388 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Activity status not available

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
5 issues
Number of providers: 9

f01083931

Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

148.66 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.84%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

44801

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03321512

Seoul, Seoul, KR

Sample Piece URL not found

377.03 TiB

Total Deal Size

17.34%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

60459

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03385456

Lake Ridge, Virginia, US

Sample Piece URL not found

209.59 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.64%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

85001

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03385462

Lake Ridge, Virginia, US

Sample Piece URL not found

210 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.66%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

76795

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03402285

Beijing, Beijing, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

210 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.66%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

83796

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03402308

Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

210 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.66%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

84128

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03402347

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

210 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.66%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

79551

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03402379

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

210 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.66%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

80508

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03526491

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

388.75 TiB

Total Deal Size

17.88%

Deal Percentage

28.13% / 109.34 TiB

Duplication

12440

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
Healthy
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
4
3.22 TiB
12.88 TiB
0.59%
5
4.03 TiB
20.16 TiB
0.92%
2
69.22 TiB
138.44 TiB
6.36%
8
53.31 TiB
429.56 TiB
19.75%
9
124.13 TiB
1.19 PiB
56.26%
7
24 TiB
168.06 TiB
7.73%
6
6.06 TiB
36.56 TiB
1.68%
1
142.5 TiB
142.5 TiB
6.55%
3
928 GiB
2.72 TiB
0.12%
427.38 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.