f01083931
Changsha, Hunan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
439.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.93%
Deal Percentage
0.16% / 704 GiB
Duplication
299693
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
0.22 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Changsha, Hunan, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
439.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.93%
Deal Percentage
0.16% / 704 GiB
Duplication
299693
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
99.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.47%
Deal Percentage
0.35% / 352 GiB
Duplication
261713
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
10 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.25%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
68915
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
20 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.5%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
10501
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
150 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.73%
Deal Percentage
0.67% / 1 TiB
Duplication
107208
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
113 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.81%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
76448
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
599 TiB
Total Deal Size
14.89%
Deal Percentage
0.01% / 64 GiB
Duplication
158044
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Virginia Beach, Virginia, US
Sample Piece URL not found
459.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.43%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
90578
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Virginia Beach, Virginia, US
Sample Piece URL not found
391.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.72%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
90740
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Beijing, Beijing, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
459.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.43%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
90587
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
447.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.12%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
90590
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
391.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.74%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
99740
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
388.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.65%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
100191
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
San Francisco, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
54.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.35%
Deal Percentage
23.24% / 12.59 TiB
Duplication
16357
Total Claims
68%
RPA
68%
Consistent RPA
32%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 32 GiB | 96 GiB | 0% |
| 9 | 24.28 TiB | 218.53 TiB | 5.43% |
| 5 | 45.78 TiB | 228.91 TiB | 5.68% |
| 13 | 7.16 TiB | 93.03 TiB | 2.31% |
| 7 | 24.66 TiB | 173.16 TiB | 4.3% |
| 8 | 225.66 TiB | 1.76 PiB | 44.86% |
| 6 | 3.69 TiB | 22.13 TiB | 0.54% |
| 12 | 35.31 TiB | 432.66 TiB | 10.75% |
| 1 | 132.94 TiB | 132.94 TiB | 3.3% |
| 11 | 49.59 TiB | 550.03 TiB | 13.66% |
| 4 | 24.56 TiB | 98.25 TiB | 2.44% |
| 2 | 608 GiB | 1.19 TiB | 0.02% |
| 10 | 26.69 TiB | 267.41 TiB | 6.64% |
| 600.94 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||