DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 35258

Client ID: f03313266

Report Detail
Report 35258 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Activity status not available

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
3 issues
Number of providers: 9

f01081394

Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

68.44 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.26%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

27622

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01083939

Montréal, Quebec, CA

Sample Piece URL not found

253.31 TiB

Total Deal Size

19.49%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

132606

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01083949

Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

260.13 TiB

Total Deal Size

20.01%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

118005

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01106668

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

98.34 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.57%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

154588

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01315096

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

74.09 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.7%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

197206

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01518369

San Jose, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

169.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

13.08%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

181407

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01889668

San Jose, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

175.81 TiB

Total Deal Size

13.53%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

257201

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03300963

Jiaxing, Zhejiang, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

99.84 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.68%

Deal Percentage

0.03% / 32 GiB

Duplication

153780

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f0870558

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

99.94 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.69%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

156535

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
Healthy
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
2
14.13 TiB
28.25 TiB
2.17%
3
35.09 TiB
105.28 TiB
8.09%
5
172.03 TiB
860.19 TiB
66.17%
4
75.88 TiB
303.5 TiB
23.34%
1
2.66 TiB
2.66 TiB
0.2%
299.78 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.