f01083939
Montréal, Quebec, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
311.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.72%
Deal Percentage
3.2% / 9.97 TiB
Duplication
262897
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
9.31 days
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Montréal, Quebec, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
311.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.72%
Deal Percentage
3.2% / 9.97 TiB
Duplication
262897
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
318.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.9%
Deal Percentage
2.16% / 6.88 TiB
Duplication
263025
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
San Jose, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
413.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.24%
Deal Percentage
0.42% / 1.72 TiB
Duplication
338184
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
412.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.22%
Deal Percentage
0.38% / 1.56 TiB
Duplication
433076
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
San Jose, California, US
350.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.67%
Deal Percentage
0.2% / 704 GiB
Duplication
358106
Total Claims
35%
RPA
35%
Consistent RPA
65%
Inconsistent RPA
10187 ms
Time to First Byte
258.82 Mbps
Bandwidth
San Jose, California, US
350.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.67%
Deal Percentage
0.19% / 672 GiB
Duplication
531351
Total Claims
25%
RPA
25%
Consistent RPA
75%
Inconsistent RPA
10197 ms
Time to First Byte
253.49 Mbps
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
371.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.21%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
373449
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
415.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.29%
Deal Percentage
0.87% / 3.63 TiB
Duplication
421661
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
414.09 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.26%
Deal Percentage
0.57% / 2.38 TiB
Duplication
434233
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, MY
204.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.07%
Deal Percentage
2.29% / 4.69 TiB
Duplication
61356
Total Claims
95%
RPA
95%
Consistent RPA
5%
Inconsistent RPA
10567 ms
Time to First Byte
55.01 Mbps
Bandwidth
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
62.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.54%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
153780
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
412.41 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.22%
Deal Percentage
0.15% / 640 GiB
Duplication
321440
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 32 GiB | 96 GiB | 0% |
| 8 | 110.31 TiB | 885.91 TiB | 21.94% |
| 10 | 9.22 TiB | 93.09 TiB | 2.3% |
| 9 | 291.63 TiB | 2.59 PiB | 65.71% |
| 4 | 99.97 TiB | 399.88 TiB | 9.9% |
| 7 | 736 GiB | 5.06 TiB | 0.12% |
| 511.88 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||