DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 210744

Client ID: f03239767

Report Detail
Report 210744 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

16.04 days

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
5 issues
Number of providers: 18

f01081419

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

404.19 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.95%

Deal Percentage

24.5% / 99.03 TiB

Duplication

278533

Total Claims

0%

RPA

0%

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01083688

Columbus, Ohio, US

Sample Piece URL not found

162.81 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.99%

Deal Percentage

99.39% / 161.81 TiB

Duplication

68617

Total Claims

0%

RPA

0%

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01083768

Incheon, Incheon, KR

Sample Piece URL not found

716.19 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.78%

Deal Percentage

99.86% / 715.19 TiB

Duplication

262176

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01083939

Montréal, Quebec, CA

Sample Piece URL not found

518.72 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.36%

Deal Percentage

1.2% / 6.25 TiB

Duplication

262897

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01083949

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

539.44 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.61%

Deal Percentage

3.29% / 17.75 TiB

Duplication

263025

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01084149

Tung Chung, Islands, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

397.47 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.87%

Deal Percentage

25.04% / 99.53 TiB

Duplication

278554

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01084788

Paris, Île-de-France, FR

Sample Piece URL not found

181.59 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.22%

Deal Percentage

99.45% / 180.59 TiB

Duplication

69156

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01084968

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

1012.41 TiB

Total Deal Size

12.4%

Deal Percentage

99.9% / 1011.41 TiB

Duplication

262010

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01106668

San Jose, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

518.75 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.36%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

338184

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01315096

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

532.56 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.53%

Deal Percentage

1.17% / 6.25 TiB

Duplication

433076

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f01518369

San Jose, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

395.25 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.84%

Deal Percentage

0.38% / 1.5 TiB

Duplication

358106

Total Claims

0%

RPA

0%

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

10187 ms

Time to First Byte

258.82 Mbps

Bandwidth

f01889668

San Jose, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

394.34 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.83%

Deal Percentage

0.15% / 608 GiB

Duplication

531351

Total Claims

0%

RPA

0%

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

10197 ms

Time to First Byte

253.49 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03055005

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

403.13 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.94%

Deal Percentage

0.02% / 96 GiB

Duplication

373449

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03055018

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

527.84 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.47%

Deal Percentage

0.02% / 128 GiB

Duplication

421661

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03055029

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

403.16 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.94%

Deal Percentage

0.02% / 96 GiB

Duplication

434233

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03240190

Petaling Jaya, Selangor, MY

Sample Piece URL not found

308.59 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.78%

Deal Percentage

2.92% / 9 TiB

Duplication

61356

Total Claims

0%

RPA

0%

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

10567 ms

Time to First Byte

55.01 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03300963

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

324.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.98%

Deal Percentage

3.85% / 12.5 TiB

Duplication

153780

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f0870558

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

420.22 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.15%

Deal Percentage

0.36% / 1.5 TiB

Duplication

321440

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
2 issues
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
7
128.28 TiB
1.11 PiB
13.95%
6
224 GiB
1.72 TiB
0.02%
5
84.84 TiB
432.16 TiB
5.29%
8
21.34 TiB
170.91 TiB
2.09%
2
2 TiB
2.02 PiB
25.39%
4
8.91 TiB
36.03 TiB
0.44%
9
478.28 TiB
4.21 PiB
52.79%
723.88 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
f03070890
96.72 TiB
3095
f03519816
99.06 TiB
3170