f02002200
Xiamen, Fujian, CN
1.22 PiB
Total Deal Size
17.29%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
89487
Total Claims
99%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
1.38 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Xiamen, Fujian, CN
1.22 PiB
Total Deal Size
17.29%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
89487
Total Claims
99%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
1.22 PiB
Total Deal Size
17.23%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
98961
Total Claims
99%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
1.22 PiB
Total Deal Size
17.29%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
96743
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
1.21 PiB
Total Deal Size
17.16%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
82088
Total Claims
82%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Moscow, Moscow, RU
1.22 PiB
Total Deal Size
17.3%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
160101
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Manila, National Capital Region, PH
Sample Piece URL not found
98.16 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.35%
Deal Percentage
0.67% / 672 GiB
Duplication
75470
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Singapore, Singapore, SG
Sample Piece URL not found
198.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.74%
Deal Percentage
0.71% / 1.41 TiB
Duplication
46139
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
197.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.72%
Deal Percentage
0.86% / 1.69 TiB
Duplication
78388
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Sample Piece URL not found
149.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.07%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
83067
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Bangkok, Bangkok, TH
Sample Piece URL not found
150 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.07%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
82992
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Seoul, Seoul, KR
Sample Piece URL not found
201.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.78%
Deal Percentage
0.73% / 1.47 TiB
Duplication
79159
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 448 GiB | 448 GiB | 0% |
| 2 | 157 TiB | 314.06 TiB | 4.33% |
| 4 | 114.59 TiB | 461.38 TiB | 6.36% |
| 3 | 95.66 TiB | 289.13 TiB | 3.98% |
| 5 | 1.21 PiB | 6.04 PiB | 85.3% |
| 1.57 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||