f01111110
Bạch Mai, Hanoi, VN
Sample Piece URL not found
163.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.08%
Deal Percentage
0.76% / 1.25 TiB
Duplication
98568
Total Claims
3%
RPA
3%
Consistent RPA
97%
Inconsistent RPA
10466 ms
Time to First Byte
8.51 Mbps
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
0.09 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Bạch Mai, Hanoi, VN
Sample Piece URL not found
163.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.08%
Deal Percentage
0.76% / 1.25 TiB
Duplication
98568
Total Claims
3%
RPA
3%
Consistent RPA
97%
Inconsistent RPA
10466 ms
Time to First Byte
8.51 Mbps
Bandwidth
Yokohama, Kanagawa, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
401.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.43%
Deal Percentage
4.89% / 19.63 TiB
Duplication
106601
Total Claims
9%
RPA
9%
Consistent RPA
91%
Inconsistent RPA
10358 ms
Time to First Byte
5.68 Mbps
Bandwidth
Bạch Mai, Hanoi, VN
Sample Piece URL not found
169.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.26%
Deal Percentage
0.96% / 1.63 TiB
Duplication
99886
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10462 ms
Time to First Byte
4.57 Mbps
Bandwidth
Johor Bahru, Johor, MY
Sample Piece URL not found
412.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.79%
Deal Percentage
5.44% / 22.44 TiB
Duplication
49338
Total Claims
8%
RPA
8%
Consistent RPA
92%
Inconsistent RPA
10467 ms
Time to First Byte
65.55 Mbps
Bandwidth
Johor Bahru, Johor, MY
Sample Piece URL not found
411.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.77%
Deal Percentage
5.28% / 21.75 TiB
Duplication
62455
Total Claims
14%
RPA
14%
Consistent RPA
86%
Inconsistent RPA
10460 ms
Time to First Byte
66.75 Mbps
Bandwidth
Johor Bahru, Johor, MY
Sample Piece URL not found
412.5 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.79%
Deal Percentage
5.45% / 22.5 TiB
Duplication
60643
Total Claims
6%
RPA
6%
Consistent RPA
94%
Inconsistent RPA
10483 ms
Time to First Byte
63.31 Mbps
Bandwidth
Johor Bahru, Johor, MY
Sample Piece URL not found
415 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.87%
Deal Percentage
6.02% / 25 TiB
Duplication
76661
Total Claims
8%
RPA
8%
Consistent RPA
92%
Inconsistent RPA
10470 ms
Time to First Byte
59.08 Mbps
Bandwidth
Yokohama, Kanagawa, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
419.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
13.01%
Deal Percentage
4.71% / 19.75 TiB
Duplication
100108
Total Claims
1%
RPA
1%
Consistent RPA
99%
Inconsistent RPA
10359 ms
Time to First Byte
4.4 Mbps
Bandwidth
Yokohama, Kanagawa, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
419.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
13%
Deal Percentage
4.63% / 19.44 TiB
Duplication
101790
Total Claims
6%
RPA
6%
Consistent RPA
94%
Inconsistent RPA
10350 ms
Time to First Byte
4.38 Mbps
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 131.44 TiB | 395.19 TiB | 12.25% |
| 2 | 181.06 TiB | 365.06 TiB | 11.31% |
| 7 | 250 TiB | 1.81 PiB | 57.6% |
| 1 | 5.56 TiB | 5.56 TiB | 0.17% |
| 4 | 140 TiB | 601.5 TiB | 18.64% |
| 708.06 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||