f0143858
Clifton, New Jersey, US
Sample Piece URL not found
263.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.31%
Deal Percentage
1.02% / 2.69 TiB
Duplication
8732
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Enterprise
No
N/A
0.12 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a month
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Clifton, New Jersey, US
Sample Piece URL not found
263.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.31%
Deal Percentage
1.02% / 2.69 TiB
Duplication
8732
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
552.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.12%
Deal Percentage
0.66% / 3.66 TiB
Duplication
44051
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Clifton, New Jersey, US
Sample Piece URL not found
285.25 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.74%
Deal Percentage
2.48% / 7.06 TiB
Duplication
9404
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
32 GiB
Total Deal Size
0%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
211355
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Clifton, New Jersey, US
Sample Piece URL not found
43.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.87%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
1417
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
535.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.78%
Deal Percentage
8.66% / 46.41 TiB
Duplication
118827
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
562.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.32%
Deal Percentage
13.01% / 73.19 TiB
Duplication
117273
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
563.88 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.35%
Deal Percentage
13.28% / 74.88 TiB
Duplication
119006
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
128 GiB
Total Deal Size
0%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
230204
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
593.41 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.94%
Deal Percentage
18.6% / 110.38 TiB
Duplication
112013
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
Sample Piece URL not found
548.31 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.03%
Deal Percentage
13.68% / 75 TiB
Duplication
111064
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
369.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.44%
Deal Percentage
0.1% / 384 GiB
Duplication
210703
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
368.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
7.41%
Deal Percentage
0.06% / 224 GiB
Duplication
210941
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Clifton, New Jersey, US
Sample Piece URL not found
281.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.67%
Deal Percentage
2.22% / 6.25 TiB
Duplication
9282
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 114.19 TiB | 1.17 PiB | 24.19% |
| 3 | 32 GiB | 96 GiB | 0% |
| 6 | 55.72 TiB | 396.97 TiB | 7.98% |
| 8 | 52.84 TiB | 439.56 TiB | 8.84% |
| 4 | 960 GiB | 3.75 TiB | 0.07% |
| 1 | 50.84 TiB | 50.88 TiB | 1.02% |
| 7 | 9.31 TiB | 66.34 TiB | 1.33% |
| 5 | 7.56 TiB | 39.91 TiB | 0.8% |
| 11 | 32.56 TiB | 359.66 TiB | 7.23% |
| 10 | 226.84 TiB | 2.35 PiB | 48.49% |
| 550.84 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| f01785922 | 57.53 TiB | 1599 |
| f01990536 | 1.3 PiB | 1600 |
| f01996948 | 54.63 TiB | 1570 |
| f01997810 | 56.34 TiB | 1550 |
| f01999562 | 138.56 TiB | 1600 |
| f02036284 | 5.03 TiB | 89 |
| f02036330 | 67 TiB | 1575 |
| f02129070 | 2.78 TiB | 89 |
| f02191439 | 8.53 TiB | 89 |
| f02199133 | 12.84 TiB | 89 |
| f02213534 | 202.94 TiB | 1600 |
| f02230460 | 49.66 TiB | 1589 |
| f02354405 | 8.28 TiB | 265 |
| f02366251 | 462.03 TiB | 1600 |
| f02369688 | 83 TiB | 1300 |
| f02516933 | 220.5 TiB | 1600 |
| f02519404 | 130.84 TiB | 1333 |
| f02635780 | 116.94 TiB | 1581 |
| f02833886 | 11.63 TiB | 372 |
| f02858872 | 64 GiB | 2 |
| f02872905 | 43.44 TiB | 1390 |