Allocators

Ecosystem

Filecoin

Fil+

Documentation

ResolutionRapid Refresh (HRRR) Model

Client ID: f03062953

GitHubView application on GitHub PulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

291.28 TiB

Allocated DataCap

2.96 PiB

Report Detail

Report 70151 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a month

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

7 issues

Number of providers: 24

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability	RPA
f010202	Dallas, Texas, US	99.56 TiB	3.16%	5.84%	Not reporting	40378	69.77%	69.77%	0.00%
f01769576	Chongqing, Chongqing, CN	23.56 TiB	0.75%	0.00%	Not reporting	9140	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01928097	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	80.25 TiB	2.55%	0.58%	Not reporting	71483	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01986236	Los Angeles, California, US	110 TiB	3.50%	0.80%	Not reporting	21548	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02013352	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	92.44 TiB	2.94%	0.37%	OK	31840	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02199999	Singapore, Singapore, SG	367.59 TiB	11.68%	49.09%	Not reporting	91077	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02837684	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	31.31 TiB	1.00%	0.00%	OK	60564	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02900009	Xiling, Fujian, CN	210.41 TiB	6.69%	0.00%	Not reporting	21327	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02953066	Los Angeles, California, US	45.09 TiB	1.43%	0.00%	Yes(16560 claims)	60485	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02956073	Singapore, Singapore, SG	93.69 TiB	2.98%	0.00%	OK	48853	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02975857	Tianjin, Tianjin, CN	44.22 TiB	1.41%	0.14%	Not reporting	4593	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03028326	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	187.5 TiB	5.96%	50.00%	Not reporting	150257	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074583	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	93.75 TiB	2.98%	0.00%	Not reporting	75026	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074586	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	93.44 TiB	2.97%	0.00%	Not reporting	74995	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074587	Seoul, Seoul, KR	93.75 TiB	2.98%	0.00%	Not reporting	75017	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074589	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	181.31 TiB	5.76%	0.00%	Not reporting	75455	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074592	Los Angeles, California, US	93.75 TiB	2.98%	0.00%	Not reporting	75297	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03080852	Toronto, Ontario, CA	366.5 TiB	11.65%	48.93%	Yes(16466 claims)	129240	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03080854	Piscataway, New Jersey, US	187.13 TiB	5.95%	0.00%	Yes(16693 claims)	92957	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03091738	Dallas, Texas, US	92.94 TiB	2.95%	0.00%	OK	91347	86.36%	86.36%	0.00%
f03144037	Paripark, Seoul, KR	183.19 TiB	5.82%	0.00%	OK	131157	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03148356	Ōi, Saitama, JP	93.56 TiB	2.97%	0.00%	OK	74227	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03156617	Sydney, New South Wales, AU	93.75 TiB	2.98%	0.00%	Not reporting	74384	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03173127	Dallas, Texas, US	188.06 TiB	5.98%	0.30%	OK	69736	73.02%	73.02%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

Healthy

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	6.91 TiB	13.75 TiB	0.43%
2	35.84 TiB	100.88 TiB	3.2%
3	88.34 TiB	320.22 TiB	10.17%
4	59.59 TiB	239.22 TiB	7.6%
5	90.56 TiB	453.13 TiB	14.39%
6	352 GiB	3.09 TiB	0.09%
7	9.16 TiB	90.25 TiB	2.86%
8	36.66 TiB	388.66 TiB	12.35%
9	123.94 TiB	1.28 PiB	41.67%
10	16 TiB	206.44 TiB	6.56%
11	1.41 TiB	19.63 TiB	0.62%
	468.75 TiB Total

Low provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.

Propose a Dashboard

Report Detail

Report 70151 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a month

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

7 issues

Number of providers: 24

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability	RPA
f010202	Dallas, Texas, US	99.56 TiB	3.16%	5.84%	Not reporting	40378	69.77%	69.77%	0.00%
f01769576	Chongqing, Chongqing, CN	23.56 TiB	0.75%	0.00%	Not reporting	9140	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01928097	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	80.25 TiB	2.55%	0.58%	Not reporting	71483	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f01986236	Los Angeles, California, US	110 TiB	3.50%	0.80%	Not reporting	21548	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02013352	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	92.44 TiB	2.94%	0.37%	OK	31840	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02199999	Singapore, Singapore, SG	367.59 TiB	11.68%	49.09%	Not reporting	91077	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02837684	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	31.31 TiB	1.00%	0.00%	OK	60564	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02900009	Xiling, Fujian, CN	210.41 TiB	6.69%	0.00%	Not reporting	21327	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02953066	Los Angeles, California, US	45.09 TiB	1.43%	0.00%	Yes(16560 claims)	60485	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02956073	Singapore, Singapore, SG	93.69 TiB	2.98%	0.00%	OK	48853	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02975857	Tianjin, Tianjin, CN	44.22 TiB	1.41%	0.14%	Not reporting	4593	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03028326	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	187.5 TiB	5.96%	50.00%	Not reporting	150257	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074583	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	93.75 TiB	2.98%	0.00%	Not reporting	75026	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074586	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	93.44 TiB	2.97%	0.00%	Not reporting	74995	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074587	Seoul, Seoul, KR	93.75 TiB	2.98%	0.00%	Not reporting	75017	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074589	Tung Chung, Islands, HK	181.31 TiB	5.76%	0.00%	Not reporting	75455	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03074592	Los Angeles, California, US	93.75 TiB	2.98%	0.00%	Not reporting	75297	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03080852	Toronto, Ontario, CA	366.5 TiB	11.65%	48.93%	Yes(16466 claims)	129240	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03080854	Piscataway, New Jersey, US	187.13 TiB	5.95%	0.00%	Yes(16693 claims)	92957	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03091738	Dallas, Texas, US	92.94 TiB	2.95%	0.00%	OK	91347	86.36%	86.36%	0.00%
f03144037	Paripark, Seoul, KR	183.19 TiB	5.82%	0.00%	OK	131157	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03148356	Ōi, Saitama, JP	93.56 TiB	2.97%	0.00%	OK	74227	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03156617	Sydney, New South Wales, AU	93.75 TiB	2.98%	0.00%	Not reporting	74384	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03173127	Dallas, Texas, US	188.06 TiB	5.98%	0.30%	OK	69736	73.02%	73.02%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

Healthy

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	6.91 TiB	13.75 TiB	0.43%
2	35.84 TiB	100.88 TiB	3.2%
3	88.34 TiB	320.22 TiB	10.17%
4	59.59 TiB	239.22 TiB	7.6%
5	90.56 TiB	453.13 TiB	14.39%
6	352 GiB	3.09 TiB	0.09%
7	9.16 TiB	90.25 TiB	2.86%
8	36.66 TiB	388.66 TiB	12.35%
9	123.94 TiB	1.28 PiB	41.67%
10	16 TiB	206.44 TiB	6.56%
11	1.41 TiB	19.63 TiB	0.62%
	468.75 TiB Total

Low provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.