Dashboard Allocators Clients Storage Providers Compliance About

ResolutionRapid Refresh (HRRR) Model

Client ID: f03062953

Remaining DataCap

291.28 TiB

Allocated DataCap

2.96 PiB

Report Detail

Report 34102 from 2025-04-12 05:15

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

4 issues

Number of providers: 24

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate (via HTTP)
f010202	Dallas, Texas, US	93.75 TiB	3.49%	0.00%	Not reporting	39789	69.45%(69.45%)
f01769576	Chongqing, Chongqing, CN	23.56 TiB	0.88%	0.00%	Not reporting	9139	0.00%(0%)
f01928097	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	79.28 TiB	2.95%	0.00%	Not reporting	49457	0.00%(0%)
f01986236	Los Angeles, California, US	109.13 TiB	4.07%	0.00%	Not reporting	21493	0.00%(0%)
f02013352	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	92.09 TiB	3.43%	0.00%	OK	31829	0.00%(0%)
f02199999	Singapore, Singapore, SG	187.16 TiB	6.97%	0.00%	Not reporting	70600	0.00%(0%)
f02837684	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	31.31 TiB	1.17%	0.00%	OK	60564	70.47%(70.47%)
f02900009	Shanghai, Shanghai, CN	209.38 TiB	7.80%	0.00%	Not reporting	21285	0.00%(0%)
f02953066	Los Angeles, California, US	45.09 TiB	1.68%	0.00%	Yes(16560 claims)	60485	70.48%(70.48%)
f02956073	Singapore, Singapore, SG	93.69 TiB	3.49%	0.00%	Yes(16604 claims)	48853	70.32%(70.32%)
f02975857	Tianjin, Tianjin, CN	44.22 TiB	1.65%	0.14%	Not reporting	4593	0.00%(0%)
f03028326	Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN	93.75 TiB	3.49%	0.00%	Not reporting	100245	0.00%(0%)
f03074583	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	93.75 TiB	3.49%	0.00%	Not reporting	75026	0.00%(0%)
f03074586	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	93.44 TiB	3.48%	0.00%	Not reporting	74995	0.00%(0%)
f03074587	Seoul, Seoul, KR	93.75 TiB	3.49%	0.00%	Not reporting	75017	0.00%(0%)
f03074589	Tseung Kwan O, Sai Kung, HK	181.31 TiB	6.76%	0.00%	Not reporting	75455	0.00%(0%)
f03074592	Los Angeles, California, US	93.75 TiB	3.49%	0.00%	Not reporting	75297	0.00%(0%)
f03080852	Toronto, Ontario, CA	187.19 TiB	6.98%	0.00%	Yes(16466 claims)	92944	13.72%(13.72%)
f03080854	Piscataway, New Jersey, US	187.13 TiB	6.97%	0.00%	Yes(16693 claims)	92957	70.69%(70.69%)
f03091738	Dallas, Texas, US	92.94 TiB	3.46%	0.00%	OK	91345	70.11%(70.11%)
f03144037	Paripark, Seoul, KR	183.19 TiB	6.83%	0.00%	Not reporting	131157	68.27%(68.27%)
f03148356	Ōi, Saitama, JP	93.56 TiB	3.49%	0.00%	Not reporting	74227	70.86%(70.86%)
f03156617	Sydney, New South Wales, AU	93.75 TiB	3.49%	0.00%	Not reporting	74384	70.07%(70.07%)
f03173127	Dallas, Texas, US	187.5 TiB	6.99%	0.00%	OK	69499	69.13%(69.13%)

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

Healthy

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	6.97 TiB	6.97 TiB	0.25%
2	36.72 TiB	73.44 TiB	2.73%
3	87.94 TiB	263.81 TiB	9.83%
4	59.06 TiB	236.25 TiB	8.8%
5	90.56 TiB	452.81 TiB	16.87%
6	352 GiB	2.06 TiB	0.07%
7	9.16 TiB	64.09 TiB	2.38%
8	36.66 TiB	293.25 TiB	10.92%
9	123.94 TiB	1.09 PiB	41.56%
10	16 TiB	160.03 TiB	5.96%
11	1.41 TiB	15.47 TiB	0.57%
	468.75 TiB Total

Low provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.