DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 193190

Client ID: f03062833

Report Detail
Report 193190 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

4.53 days

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
5 issues
Number of providers: 27

f014686

Montréal, Quebec, CA

Sample Piece URL not found

522.53 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.04%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

120321

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f014699

Dallas, Texas, US

Sample Piece URL not found

537.47 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.19%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

120581

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02837684

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

149.94 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.45%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

60564

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02953066

Washington, District of Columbia, US

Sample Piece URL not found

148.19 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.43%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

60485

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f02956073

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

109.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.06%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

48853

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03028412

Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN

Sample Piece URL not found

98.84 TiB

Total Deal Size

0.95%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

24390

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03080852

Toronto, Ontario, CA

Sample Piece URL not found

494.72 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.77%

Deal Percentage

49.76% / 246.19 TiB

Duplication

129240

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03080854

Piscataway, New Jersey, US

Sample Piece URL not found

249.66 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.41%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

92957

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03144037

Gangseo-gu, Seoul, KR

Sample Piece URL not found

616.53 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.95%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

131157

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03148356

Ōi, Saitama, JP

Sample Piece URL not found

179.78 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.74%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

74227

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03156617

Sydney, New South Wales, AU

Sample Piece URL not found

180 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.74%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

74384

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03159226

Dallas, Texas, US

Sample Piece URL not found

514 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.96%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

80370

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03188440

Vancouver, British Columbia, CA

Sample Piece URL not found

478.31 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.62%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

126908

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03190614

Dubai, Dubai, AE

Sample Piece URL not found

393.5 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.8%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

126265

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03190616

Tokyo, Tokyo, JP

Sample Piece URL not found

395.84 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.82%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

126419

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03196399

Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, MY

Sample Piece URL not found

396.84 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.83%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

111216

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03196401

Osaka, Osaka, JP

Sample Piece URL not found

390.88 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.77%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

110747

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03275720

Dallas, Texas, US

Sample Piece URL not found

544.59 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.26%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

128316

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03298672

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE

Sample Piece URL not found

461.09 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.45%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

147804

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03308920

Tokyo, Tokyo, JP

Sample Piece URL not found

469.72 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.53%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

121387

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03308922

Tokyo, Tokyo, JP

Sample Piece URL not found

431.19 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.16%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

105741

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03315878

Ōi, Saitama, JP

Sample Piece URL not found

773.34 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.46%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

130755

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03325608

Gangseo-gu, Seoul, KR

Sample Piece URL not found

588.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.68%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

111458

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03335798

Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN

Sample Piece URL not found

499.34 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.82%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

80679

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03540144

Manila, National Capital Region, PH

Sample Piece URL not found

184.59 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.78%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

213092

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03540147

Manila, National Capital Region, PH

Sample Piece URL not found

245.5 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.37%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

213412

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03540153

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

305.72 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.95%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

224300

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
10
498.13 TiB
5.08 PiB
50.22%
3
124.75 TiB
374.25 TiB
3.61%
7
101.72 TiB
712.06 TiB
6.87%
2
34.38 TiB
68.75 TiB
0.66%
9
49.56 TiB
468.56 TiB
4.52%
5
103.66 TiB
518.28 TiB
5%
1
24.31 TiB
24.31 TiB
0.23%
4
316.31 TiB
1.24 PiB
12.21%
6
181.03 TiB
1.06 PiB
10.48%
8
79.81 TiB
639.5 TiB
6.17%
1.48 PiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.