f01969779
Boardman, Oregon, US
Sample Piece URL not found
873.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.2%
Deal Percentage
3.28% / 28.63 TiB
Duplication
95605
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
0.36 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Boardman, Oregon, US
Sample Piece URL not found
873.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.2%
Deal Percentage
3.28% / 28.63 TiB
Duplication
95605
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
San Jose, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
870.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.15%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
101147
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
492.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.31%
Deal Percentage
11.93% / 58.75 TiB
Duplication
217141
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Beijing, Beijing, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
504.47 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.47%
Deal Percentage
12.24% / 61.75 TiB
Duplication
221291
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Los Angeles, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
500.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
6.42%
Deal Percentage
11.89% / 59.56 TiB
Duplication
215243
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
183.28 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.35%
Deal Percentage
0.48% / 896 GiB
Duplication
287659
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
451.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.79%
Deal Percentage
5.23% / 23.63 TiB
Duplication
216303
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
371.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.77%
Deal Percentage
0.03% / 96 GiB
Duplication
217032
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
432.22 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.54%
Deal Percentage
0.35% / 1.5 TiB
Duplication
113862
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
397.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.09%
Deal Percentage
0.68% / 2.72 TiB
Duplication
113910
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH
430.34 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.52%
Deal Percentage
0.41% / 1.78 TiB
Duplication
238473
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH
428.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.5%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 96 GiB
Duplication
235266
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
745.06 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.55%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 128 GiB
Duplication
84462
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
731.78 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.38%
Deal Percentage
0.03% / 224 GiB
Duplication
126411
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, MY
187.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.41%
Deal Percentage
0.22% / 416 GiB
Duplication
74912
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
187.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.4%
Deal Percentage
0.12% / 224 GiB
Duplication
82177
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
2.09 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.03%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
200075
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
2.28 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.03%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
197614
Total Claims
84%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
2.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.03%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
199768
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
2.19 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.03%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
200298
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
160 GiB
Total Deal Size
0%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
180042
Total Claims
100%
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
2.09 TiB
Total Deal Size
0.03%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
339
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
N/A
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 197.69 TiB | 395.84 TiB | 5.07% |
| 1 | 206.75 TiB | 207.16 TiB | 2.65% |
| 4 | 525.97 TiB | 2.08 PiB | 27.27% |
| 5 | 1.72 TiB | 8.59 TiB | 0.11% |
| 12 | 28 TiB | 410.75 TiB | 5.26% |
| 9 | 68.47 TiB | 632.94 TiB | 8.11% |
| 11 | 26.94 TiB | 363.34 TiB | 4.65% |
| 7 | 3.28 TiB | 23.22 TiB | 0.29% |
| 3 | 142.84 TiB | 433.53 TiB | 5.55% |
| 10 | 305.38 TiB | 3.03 PiB | 39.79% |
| 6 | 960 GiB | 5.63 TiB | 0.07% |
| 8 | 10.72 TiB | 87.78 TiB | 1.12% |
| 1.48 PiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| No results. | ||