DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 178779

Client ID: f03079189

Report Detail
Report 178779 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

20.73 days

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
5 issues
Number of providers: 29
ProviderLocationTotal Deal SizePercentageDuplication
Total claims
RPA
Piece URL
f010479Paris, Île-de-France, FR
18.44 TiB
0.12%
6.95%
1970
28%
f01115949Incheon, Incheon, KR
7.22 TiB
0.05%
3.46%
15070
N/A
f01163272Perm, Perm Krai, RU
8.66 TiB
0.06%
0%
1354
N/A
f01222595Moscow, Moscow, RU
7.69 TiB
0.05%
1.63%
20237
N/A
f01249Warsaw, Mazovia, PL
160 GiB
0%
0%
3489
68%
f01443744Falkenstein, Saxony, DE
2.44 TiB
0.02%
0%
101
N/A
f01770778Seoul, Seoul, KR
6.53 TiB
0.04%
1.91%
15171
18%
f0187709Khimki, Moscow Oblast, RU
9.16 TiB
0.06%
1.37%
10412
13.5%
f01900525Incheon, Incheon, KR
4.66 TiB
0.03%
0%
17260
16.5%
f01924824Seoul, Seoul, KR
5.09 TiB
0.03%
5.52%
18454
16%
f01924891Seoul, Seoul, KR
7.16 TiB
0.05%
3.49%
17652
14%
f01927163Seoul, Seoul, KR
7.38 TiB
0.05%
5.51%
17858
12%
f020378Asenovgrad, Plovdiv, BG
6.34 TiB
0.04%
1.97%
6008
N/A
f02177086Kazan, Tatarstan Republic, RU
11.22 TiB
0.07%
3.9%
661
N/A
f02620Warsaw, Mazovia, PL
576 GiB
0%
0%
5176
35%
f02639429Cinco Ranch, Texas, US
1.19 TiB
0.01%
0%
31843
11%
f02822919Palmerston North, Manawatu-Wanganui, NZ
608 GiB
0%
0%
1276
N/A
f03084393Danbury, Connecticut, US
16.16 TiB
0.1%
8.12%
4559
N/A
f03091958Incheon, Incheon, KR
864 GiB
0.01%
0%
18309
N/A
f03132919Seoul, Seoul, KR
64 GiB
0%
0%
12404
N/A
f03134685Seoul, Seoul, KR
800 GiB
0.01%
0%
20610
N/A
f03303347Seoul, Seoul, KR
32 GiB
0%
0%
3380
N/A
f03623016Marne La Vallée, Île-de-France, FR
1.19 TiB
0.01%
0%
79507
43%
f03623017Paris, Île-de-France, FR
1.22 TiB
0.01%
0%
3263
100%
f03644166Marne La Vallée, Île-de-France, FR
1.03 TiB
0.01%
0%
19412
79%
f03644168Marne La Vallée, Île-de-France, FR
1.09 TiB
0.01%
0%
19424
86%
f0717969La Palma, California, US
10.84 TiB
0.07%
2.59%
44132
N/A
f08403Great Rissington, England, GB
9.53 TiB
0.06%
5.57%
16916
38%
f097777Yaremche, Ivano-Frankivsk, UA
8.78 TiB
0.06%
0%
10594
N/A

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
2 issues
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
1
576 GiB
576 GiB
0.36%
7
2.66 TiB
21.16 TiB
13.55%
8
8.25 TiB
66.22 TiB
42.43%
9
1.06 TiB
9.56 TiB
6.12%
6
1.47 TiB
11.13 TiB
7.12%
5
96 GiB
768 GiB
0.48%
2
32 GiB
64 GiB
0.04%
10
288 GiB
2.81 TiB
1.8%
4
32 GiB
256 GiB
0.16%
12
3.28 TiB
39.41 TiB
25.25%
11
384 GiB
4.13 TiB
2.64%
18.09 TiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
f02824311
6.69 TiB
20