Report 173969

Client ID: f03079189

Report Detail

Report 173969 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

20.73 days

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

7 issues

Number of providers: 29

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	Total claims	RPA
f010479	Paris, Île-de-France, FR	18.44 TiB	0.12%	6.95%	1970	40%
f01115949	Seoul, Seoul, KR	7.22 TiB	0.05%	3.46%	15070	N/A
f01163272	Perm, Perm Krai, RU	8.66 TiB	0.06%	0%	1354	N/A
f01222595	Moscow, Moscow, RU	7.69 TiB	0.05%	1.63%	20237	N/A
f01249	Warsaw, Mazovia, PL	160 GiB	0%	0%	3489	100%
f01443744	Falkenstein, Saxony, DE	2.44 TiB	0.02%	0%	101	N/A
f01770778	Seoul, Seoul, KR	6.53 TiB	0.04%	1.91%	15171	N/A
f0187709	Khimki, Moscow Oblast, RU	9.16 TiB	0.06%	1.37%	10412	11%
f01900525	Seoul, Seoul, KR	4.66 TiB	0.03%	0%	17260	N/A
f01924824	Seoul, Seoul, KR	5.09 TiB	0.03%	5.52%	18454	N/A
f01924891	Seoul, Seoul, KR	7.16 TiB	0.05%	3.49%	17652	N/A
f01927163	Seoul, Seoul, KR	7.38 TiB	0.05%	5.51%	17858	N/A
f020378	Asenovgrad, Plovdiv, BG	6.34 TiB	0.04%	1.97%	6008	N/A
f02177086	Kazan, Tatarstan Republic, RU	11.22 TiB	0.07%	3.9%	661	N/A
f02620	Warsaw, Mazovia, PL	576 GiB	0%	0%	5176	36%
f02639429	Cinco Ranch, Texas, US	1.19 TiB	0.01%	0%	31843	26%
f02822919	Palmerston North, Manawatu-Wanganui, NZ	608 GiB	0%	0%	1276	N/A
f03084393	Danbury, Connecticut, US	16.16 TiB	0.1%	8.12%	4559	N/A
f03091958	Seoul, Seoul, KR	864 GiB	0.01%	0%	18309	27%
f03132919	Seoul, Seoul, KR	64 GiB	0%	0%	12404	N/A
f03134685	Incheon, Incheon, KR	800 GiB	0.01%	0%	20610	24%
f03303347	Incheon, Incheon, KR	32 GiB	0%	0%	3380	N/A
f03623016	Marne La Vallée, Île-de-France, FR	1.19 TiB	0.01%	0%	79507	47%
f03623017	Paris, Île-de-France, FR	1.22 TiB	0.01%	0%	3263	100%
f03644166	Marne La Vallée, Île-de-France, FR	1.03 TiB	0.01%	0%	19412	82%
f03644168	Marne La Vallée, Île-de-France, FR	1.09 TiB	0.01%	0%	19424	84%
f0717969	Los Angeles, California, US	10.84 TiB	0.07%	2.59%	44132	N/A
f08403	Bourton on the Water, England, GB	9.53 TiB	0.06%	5.57%	16916	78%
f097777	Yaremche, Ivano-Frankivsk, UA	8.78 TiB	0.06%	0%	10594	N/A

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

2 issues

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	576 GiB	576 GiB	0.36%
7	2.66 TiB	21.16 TiB	13.55%
8	8.25 TiB	66.22 TiB	42.43%
9	1.06 TiB	9.56 TiB	6.12%
6	1.47 TiB	11.13 TiB	7.12%
5	96 GiB	768 GiB	0.48%
2	32 GiB	64 GiB	0.04%
10	288 GiB	2.81 TiB	1.8%
4	32 GiB	256 GiB	0.16%
12	3.28 TiB	39.41 TiB	25.25%
11	384 GiB	4.13 TiB	2.64%
	18.09 TiB Total

Wrong provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total Deals Affected	Unique CIDs
f02824311	6.69 TiB	20