jcphysics

Client ID: f03070890

GitHubView application on GitHub PulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

0 B

Allocated DataCap

4 PiB

Report Detail

Report 43601 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Activity status not available

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

4 issues

Number of providers: 31

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability	RPA
f010202	Dallas, Texas, US	100 TiB	1.05%	0.00%	Not reporting	40378	31.49%	31.49%	0.00%
f014686	Montréal, Quebec, CA	518.22 TiB	5.43%	0.00%	OK	118738	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f014699	Dallas, Texas, US	504.09 TiB	5.28%	0.00%	OK	118753	9.24%	9.24%	0.00%
f01674133	Osaka, Osaka, JP	15 TiB	0.16%	0.00%	Not reporting	55492	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02837684	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	149.91 TiB	1.57%	0.00%	OK	60564	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02953066	Los Angeles, California, US	148.72 TiB	1.56%	0.00%	Yes(16560 claims)	60485	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f02956073	Singapore, Singapore, SG	109.84 TiB	1.15%	0.00%	OK	48853	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03028412	Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN	98.91 TiB	1.04%	0.00%	OK	24390	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03080852	Toronto, Ontario, CA	339 TiB	3.55%	0.00%	Yes(16466 claims)	129240	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03080854	Piscataway, New Jersey, US	299.63 TiB	3.14%	0.00%	Yes(16693 claims)	92957	8.23%	8.23%	0.00%
f03091738	Dallas, Texas, US	892.03 TiB	9.34%	0.00%	OK	91347	12.60%	0.00%	0.00%
f03148356	Ōi, Saitama, JP	198.84 TiB	2.08%	0.00%	OK	74227	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%
f03156617	Sydney, New South Wales, AU	199.97 TiB	2.09%	0.00%	Not reporting	74384	21.39%	21.39%	0.00%
f03173124	Seoul, Seoul, KR	444.41 TiB	4.65%	0.00%	OK	106159	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03188440	Vancouver, British Columbia, CA	298.06 TiB	3.12%	0.00%	Not reporting	126908	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03188443	Singapore, Singapore, SG	447.41 TiB	4.68%	0.00%	OK	106783	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03190614	Dubai, Dubai, AE	386.03 TiB	4.04%	0.00%	OK	126265	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03190616	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	297 TiB	3.11%	0.00%	OK	126419	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03196399	Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, MY	78.28 TiB	0.82%	0.00%	OK	111216	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03196401	Osaka, Osaka, JP	78.88 TiB	0.83%	0.00%	OK	110747	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03201941	Toronto, Ontario, CA	488.63 TiB	5.12%	0.00%	OK	82001	8.82%	8.82%	0.00%
f03228953	Bangkok, Bangkok, TH	535.25 TiB	5.60%	0.00%	OK	81652	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03251827	Singapore, Singapore, SG	78.47 TiB	0.82%	0.00%	OK	50209	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03251828	Dallas, Texas, US	80 TiB	0.84%	0.00%	OK	50935	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03254061	Montréal, Quebec, CA	596.91 TiB	6.25%	0.00%	OK	108351	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03254063	Piscataway, New Jersey, US	597.5 TiB	6.26%	0.00%	Not reporting	107894	5.23%	5.23%	0.00%
f03254125	Dallas, Texas, US	339.06 TiB	3.55%	0.00%	OK	85502	9.62%	9.62%	0.00%
f03259560	Osaka, Osaka, JP	303.09 TiB	3.17%	0.00%	Not reporting	84175	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03265465	Manila, Metro Manila, PH	678.47 TiB	7.10%	0.00%	OK	119516	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03275720	Dallas, Texas, US	240 TiB	2.51%	0.00%	OK	122646	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03513103	Paripark, Seoul, KR	8.38 TiB	0.09%	0.00%	Yes(1075 claims)	56440	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

Healthy

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	288 GiB	288 GiB	0%
2	87 TiB	174 TiB	1.82%
3	39.75 TiB	119.25 TiB	1.24%
4	32.72 TiB	130.88 TiB	1.37%
5	128.25 TiB	641.25 TiB	6.71%
6	39.34 TiB	236.06 TiB	2.47%
7	32.16 TiB	225.09 TiB	2.35%
8	296.97 TiB	2.32 PiB	24.87%
9	141.78 TiB	1.25 PiB	13.36%
10	364.47 TiB	3.56 PiB	38.16%
11	66.06 TiB	726.69 TiB	7.6%
	1.2 PiB Total

Low provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.

Propose a Dashboard