Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

jcphysics

Client ID: f03070890

GitHubView application on GitHubPulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

0 B

Allocated DataCap

4 PiB
Propose a Dashboard
Report Detail
Report 36714 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Activity status not available

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
4 issues
Number of providers: 29
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
RPA
f010202
Dallas, Texas, US
100 TiB
1.05%
0.00%
Not reporting
39789
4.17%
4.17%
0.00%
f014686
Montréal, Quebec, CA
518.22 TiB
5.44%
0.00%
OK
118738
4.23%
4.23%
0.00%
f014699
Dallas, Texas, US
504.09 TiB
5.29%
0.00%
OK
118591
2.81%
2.81%
0.00%
f02837684
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
149.91 TiB
1.57%
0.00%
OK
60564
5.98%
5.98%
0.00%
f02953066
Los Angeles, California, US
148.72 TiB
1.56%
0.00%
Yes(16560 claims)
60485
5.61%
5.61%
0.00%
f02956073
Singapore, Singapore, SG
109.84 TiB
1.15%
0.00%
Yes(16604 claims)
48853
4.54%
4.54%
0.00%
f03028412
Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN
98.91 TiB
1.04%
0.00%
OK
24390
5.12%
5.12%
0.00%
f03080852
Toronto, Ontario, CA
339 TiB
3.56%
0.00%
Yes(16466 claims)
92944
5.65%
5.65%
0.00%
f03080854
Piscataway, New Jersey, US
299.63 TiB
3.15%
0.00%
Yes(16693 claims)
92957
4.78%
4.78%
0.00%
f03091738
Dallas, Texas, US
892.03 TiB
9.36%
0.00%
OK
91345
5.28%
5.28%
0.00%
f03148356
Ōi, Saitama, JP
198.84 TiB
2.09%
0.00%
Not reporting
74227
6.24%
6.24%
0.00%
f03156617
Sydney, New South Wales, AU
199.97 TiB
2.10%
0.00%
Not reporting
74384
4.21%
4.21%
0.00%
f03173124
Seoul, Seoul, KR
444.41 TiB
4.66%
0.00%
OK
106159
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03188440
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
298.06 TiB
3.13%
0.00%
Not reporting
126907
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03188443
Singapore, Singapore, SG
447.41 TiB
4.70%
0.00%
OK
106783
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03190614
Dubai, Dubai, AE
386.03 TiB
4.05%
0.00%
OK
126264
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03190616
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
297 TiB
3.12%
0.00%
OK
126419
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03196399
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, MY
78.28 TiB
0.82%
0.00%
OK
111215
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03196401
Osaka, Osaka, JP
78.88 TiB
0.83%
0.00%
OK
110746
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03201941
Toronto, Ontario, CA
488.63 TiB
5.13%
0.00%
OK
82000
5.31%
5.31%
0.00%
f03228953
Bangkok, Bangkok, TH
535.25 TiB
5.62%
0.00%
Not reporting
81652
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03251827
Singapore, Singapore, SG
78.47 TiB
0.82%
0.00%
Not reporting
50209
5.52%
5.52%
0.00%
f03251828
Dallas, Texas, US
80 TiB
0.84%
0.00%
OK
50935
5.22%
5.22%
0.00%
f03254061
Montréal, Quebec, CA
596.91 TiB
6.27%
0.00%
OK
108351
4.34%
4.34%
0.00%
f03254063
Piscataway, New Jersey, US
597.5 TiB
6.27%
0.00%
Not reporting
107894
6.17%
6.17%
0.00%
f03254125
Dallas, Texas, US
339.06 TiB
3.56%
0.00%
OK
85502
3.75%
3.75%
0.00%
f03259560
Osaka, Osaka, JP
303.09 TiB
3.18%
0.00%
Not reporting
84175
5.79%
5.79%
0.00%
f03265465
Manila, Metro Manila, PH
678.47 TiB
7.12%
0.00%
OK
119516
3.39%
3.39%
0.00%
f03275720
Dallas, Texas, US
240 TiB
2.52%
0.00%
OK
122646
4.13%
4.13%
0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
Healthy
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
288 GiB
288 GiB
0%
2
93.34 TiB
186.69 TiB
1.95%
3
36.34 TiB
109.03 TiB
1.14%
4
31.97 TiB
127.88 TiB
1.34%
5
134.44 TiB
672.19 TiB
7.05%
6
33.19 TiB
199.13 TiB
2.09%
7
30.22 TiB
211.53 TiB
2.22%
8
297.69 TiB
2.33 PiB
24.99%
9
140.81 TiB
1.24 PiB
13.3%
10
364.44 TiB
3.56 PiB
38.25%
11
66.06 TiB
726.69 TiB
7.62%
1.2 PiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
No results.