Allocators

Ecosystem

Filecoin

Fil+

Documentation

jcphysics

Client ID: f03070890

GitHubView application on GitHub PulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

0 B

Allocated DataCap

4 PiB

Report Detail

Report 34072 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Activity status not available

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

4 issues

Number of providers: 29

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability	RPA
f010202	Dallas, Texas, US	100 TiB	1.05%	0.00%	Not reporting	39789	69.45%	69.45%	0.00%
f014686	Montréal, Quebec, CA	518.22 TiB	5.44%	0.00%	OK	118738	57.28%	57.28%	0.00%
f014699	Dallas, Texas, US	504.09 TiB	5.29%	0.00%	OK	118591	54.60%	54.60%	0.00%
f02837684	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	149.91 TiB	1.57%	0.00%	OK	60564	70.47%	70.47%	0.00%
f02953066	Los Angeles, California, US	148.72 TiB	1.56%	0.00%	Yes(16560 claims)	60485	70.48%	70.48%	0.00%
f02956073	Singapore, Singapore, SG	109.84 TiB	1.15%	0.00%	Yes(16604 claims)	48853	70.32%	70.32%	0.00%
f03028412	Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN	98.91 TiB	1.04%	0.00%	OK	24390	66.13%	66.13%	0.00%
f03080852	Toronto, Ontario, CA	339 TiB	3.56%	0.00%	Yes(16466 claims)	92944	13.72%	13.72%	0.00%
f03080854	Piscataway, New Jersey, US	299.63 TiB	3.15%	0.00%	Yes(16693 claims)	92957	70.69%	70.69%	0.00%
f03091738	Dallas, Texas, US	892.03 TiB	9.36%	0.00%	OK	91345	70.11%	70.11%	0.00%
f03148356	Ōi, Saitama, JP	198.84 TiB	2.09%	0.00%	Not reporting	74227	70.86%	70.86%	0.00%
f03156617	Sydney, New South Wales, AU	199.97 TiB	2.10%	0.00%	Not reporting	74384	70.07%	70.07%	0.00%
f03173124	Seoul, Seoul, KR	444.41 TiB	4.66%	0.00%	OK	106159	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03188440	Coquitlam, British Columbia, CA	298.06 TiB	3.13%	0.00%	Not reporting	126907	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03188443	Singapore, Singapore, SG	447.41 TiB	4.70%	0.00%	OK	106783	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03190614	Dubai, Dubai, AE	386.03 TiB	4.05%	0.00%	OK	126264	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03190616	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	297 TiB	3.12%	0.00%	OK	126419	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03196399	Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, MY	78.28 TiB	0.82%	0.00%	OK	111215	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03196401	Osaka, Osaka, JP	78.88 TiB	0.83%	0.00%	OK	110746	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03201941	Toronto, Ontario, CA	488.63 TiB	5.13%	0.00%	OK	82000	71.40%	71.40%	0.00%
f03228953	Bangkok, Bangkok, TH	535.25 TiB	5.62%	0.00%	Not reporting	81652	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03251827	Singapore, Singapore, SG	78.47 TiB	0.82%	0.00%	Not reporting	50209	67.84%	67.84%	0.00%
f03251828	Dallas, Texas, US	80 TiB	0.84%	0.00%	OK	50935	69.61%	69.61%	0.00%
f03254061	Montréal, Quebec, CA	596.91 TiB	6.27%	0.00%	OK	108351	69.84%	69.84%	0.00%
f03254063	Piscataway, New Jersey, US	597.5 TiB	6.27%	0.00%	Not reporting	107894	67.71%	67.71%	0.00%
f03254125	Dallas, Texas, US	339.06 TiB	3.56%	0.00%	OK	85502	57.88%	57.88%	0.00%
f03259560	Osaka, Osaka, JP	303.09 TiB	3.18%	0.00%	Not reporting	84175	69.81%	69.81%	0.00%
f03265465	Manila, Metro Manila, PH	678.47 TiB	7.12%	0.00%	OK	119516	54.84%	54.84%	0.00%
f03275720	Dallas, Texas, US	240 TiB	2.52%	0.00%	OK	122646	70.47%	70.47%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

Healthy

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	288 GiB	288 GiB	0%
2	93.34 TiB	186.69 TiB	1.95%
3	36.34 TiB	109.03 TiB	1.14%
4	31.97 TiB	127.88 TiB	1.34%
5	134.44 TiB	672.19 TiB	7.05%
6	33.19 TiB	199.13 TiB	2.09%
7	30.22 TiB	211.53 TiB	2.22%
8	297.69 TiB	2.33 PiB	24.99%
9	140.81 TiB	1.24 PiB	13.3%
10	364.44 TiB	3.56 PiB	38.25%
11	66.06 TiB	726.69 TiB	7.62%
	1.2 PiB Total

Low provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.

Propose a Dashboard

Report Detail

Report 34072 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Activity status not available

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

4 issues

Number of providers: 29

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability	RPA
f010202	Dallas, Texas, US	100 TiB	1.05%	0.00%	Not reporting	39789	69.45%	69.45%	0.00%
f014686	Montréal, Quebec, CA	518.22 TiB	5.44%	0.00%	OK	118738	57.28%	57.28%	0.00%
f014699	Dallas, Texas, US	504.09 TiB	5.29%	0.00%	OK	118591	54.60%	54.60%	0.00%
f02837684	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	149.91 TiB	1.57%	0.00%	OK	60564	70.47%	70.47%	0.00%
f02953066	Los Angeles, California, US	148.72 TiB	1.56%	0.00%	Yes(16560 claims)	60485	70.48%	70.48%	0.00%
f02956073	Singapore, Singapore, SG	109.84 TiB	1.15%	0.00%	Yes(16604 claims)	48853	70.32%	70.32%	0.00%
f03028412	Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN	98.91 TiB	1.04%	0.00%	OK	24390	66.13%	66.13%	0.00%
f03080852	Toronto, Ontario, CA	339 TiB	3.56%	0.00%	Yes(16466 claims)	92944	13.72%	13.72%	0.00%
f03080854	Piscataway, New Jersey, US	299.63 TiB	3.15%	0.00%	Yes(16693 claims)	92957	70.69%	70.69%	0.00%
f03091738	Dallas, Texas, US	892.03 TiB	9.36%	0.00%	OK	91345	70.11%	70.11%	0.00%
f03148356	Ōi, Saitama, JP	198.84 TiB	2.09%	0.00%	Not reporting	74227	70.86%	70.86%	0.00%
f03156617	Sydney, New South Wales, AU	199.97 TiB	2.10%	0.00%	Not reporting	74384	70.07%	70.07%	0.00%
f03173124	Seoul, Seoul, KR	444.41 TiB	4.66%	0.00%	OK	106159	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03188440	Coquitlam, British Columbia, CA	298.06 TiB	3.13%	0.00%	Not reporting	126907	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03188443	Singapore, Singapore, SG	447.41 TiB	4.70%	0.00%	OK	106783	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03190614	Dubai, Dubai, AE	386.03 TiB	4.05%	0.00%	OK	126264	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03190616	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	297 TiB	3.12%	0.00%	OK	126419	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03196399	Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, MY	78.28 TiB	0.82%	0.00%	OK	111215	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03196401	Osaka, Osaka, JP	78.88 TiB	0.83%	0.00%	OK	110746	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03201941	Toronto, Ontario, CA	488.63 TiB	5.13%	0.00%	OK	82000	71.40%	71.40%	0.00%
f03228953	Bangkok, Bangkok, TH	535.25 TiB	5.62%	0.00%	Not reporting	81652	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03251827	Singapore, Singapore, SG	78.47 TiB	0.82%	0.00%	Not reporting	50209	67.84%	67.84%	0.00%
f03251828	Dallas, Texas, US	80 TiB	0.84%	0.00%	OK	50935	69.61%	69.61%	0.00%
f03254061	Montréal, Quebec, CA	596.91 TiB	6.27%	0.00%	OK	108351	69.84%	69.84%	0.00%
f03254063	Piscataway, New Jersey, US	597.5 TiB	6.27%	0.00%	Not reporting	107894	67.71%	67.71%	0.00%
f03254125	Dallas, Texas, US	339.06 TiB	3.56%	0.00%	OK	85502	57.88%	57.88%	0.00%
f03259560	Osaka, Osaka, JP	303.09 TiB	3.18%	0.00%	Not reporting	84175	69.81%	69.81%	0.00%
f03265465	Manila, Metro Manila, PH	678.47 TiB	7.12%	0.00%	OK	119516	54.84%	54.84%	0.00%
f03275720	Dallas, Texas, US	240 TiB	2.52%	0.00%	OK	122646	70.47%	70.47%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

Healthy

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	288 GiB	288 GiB	0%
2	93.34 TiB	186.69 TiB	1.95%
3	36.34 TiB	109.03 TiB	1.14%
4	31.97 TiB	127.88 TiB	1.34%
5	134.44 TiB	672.19 TiB	7.05%
6	33.19 TiB	199.13 TiB	2.09%
7	30.22 TiB	211.53 TiB	2.22%
8	297.69 TiB	2.33 PiB	24.99%
9	140.81 TiB	1.24 PiB	13.3%
10	364.44 TiB	3.56 PiB	38.25%
11	66.06 TiB	726.69 TiB	7.62%
	1.2 PiB Total

Low provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.