Allocators

Ecosystem

Filecoin

Fil+

Documentation

jcphysics

Client ID: f03070890

GitHubView application on GitHub PulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

0 B

Allocated DataCap

4 PiB

Report Detail

Report 31841 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Activity status not available

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

3 issues

Number of providers: 29

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability	RPA
f010202	Dallas, Texas, US	100 TiB	1.05%	0.00%	Not reporting	39789	76.89%	76.89%	0.00%
f014686	Montréal, Quebec, CA	518.22 TiB	5.44%	0.00%	OK	118738	60.44%	60.44%	0.00%
f014699	Dallas, Texas, US	504.09 TiB	5.29%	0.00%	OK	118591	58.00%	58.00%	0.00%
f02837684	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	149.91 TiB	1.57%	0.00%	Not reporting	60564	75.86%	75.86%	0.00%
f02953066	Los Angeles, California, US	148.72 TiB	1.56%	0.00%	Not reporting	60485	76.75%	76.75%	0.00%
f02956073	Singapore, Singapore, SG	109.84 TiB	1.15%	0.00%	Not reporting	48853	76.63%	76.63%	0.00%
f03028412	Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN	98.91 TiB	1.04%	0.00%	Not reporting	24390	74.46%	74.46%	0.00%
f03080852	Toronto, Ontario, CA	339 TiB	3.56%	0.00%	Not reporting	92944	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03080854	Piscataway, New Jersey, US	299.63 TiB	3.15%	0.00%	Not reporting	92957	76.65%	76.65%	0.00%
f03091738	Dallas, Texas, US	892.03 TiB	9.36%	0.00%	Not reporting	91345	76.29%	76.29%	0.00%
f03148356	Ōi, Saitama, JP	198.84 TiB	2.09%	0.00%	Not reporting	74227	75.66%	75.66%	0.00%
f03156617	Sydney, New South Wales, AU	199.97 TiB	2.10%	0.00%	Not reporting	74384	76.45%	76.45%	0.00%
f03173124	Seoul, Seoul, KR	444.41 TiB	4.66%	0.00%	OK	106159	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03188440	Vancouver, British Columbia, CA	298.06 TiB	3.13%	0.00%	Not reporting	126907	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03188443	Singapore, Singapore, SG	447.41 TiB	4.70%	0.00%	Not reporting	106783	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03190614	Dubai, Dubai, AE	386.03 TiB	4.05%	0.00%	OK	126264	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03190616	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	297 TiB	3.12%	0.00%	OK	126419	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03196399	Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, MY	78.28 TiB	0.82%	0.00%	OK	111215	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03196401	Osaka, Osaka, JP	78.88 TiB	0.83%	0.00%	OK	110746	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03201941	Toronto, Ontario, CA	488.63 TiB	5.13%	0.00%	OK	82000	76.08%	76.08%	0.00%
f03228953	Bangkok, Bangkok, TH	535.25 TiB	5.62%	0.00%	Not reporting	81652	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03251827	Singapore, Singapore, SG	78.47 TiB	0.82%	0.00%	Not reporting	50209	75.41%	75.41%	0.00%
f03251828	Dallas, Texas, US	80 TiB	0.84%	0.00%	Not reporting	50935	75.50%	75.50%	0.00%
f03254061	Montréal, Quebec, CA	596.91 TiB	6.27%	0.00%	OK	108351	75.68%	75.68%	0.00%
f03254063	Piscataway, New Jersey, US	597.5 TiB	6.27%	0.00%	Not reporting	107894	75.17%	75.17%	0.00%
f03254125	Dallas, Texas, US	339.06 TiB	3.56%	0.00%	OK	85502	64.48%	64.48%	0.00%
f03259560	Osaka, Osaka, JP	303.09 TiB	3.18%	0.00%	Not reporting	84175	75.62%	75.62%	0.00%
f03265465	Manila, Metro Manila, PH	678.47 TiB	7.12%	0.00%	OK	119516	59.29%	59.29%	0.00%
f03275720	Dallas, Texas, US	240 TiB	2.52%	0.00%	OK	122646	76.07%	76.07%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

Healthy

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	288 GiB	288 GiB	0%
2	93.34 TiB	186.69 TiB	1.95%
3	36.34 TiB	109.03 TiB	1.14%
4	31.97 TiB	127.88 TiB	1.34%
5	134.44 TiB	672.19 TiB	7.05%
6	33.19 TiB	199.13 TiB	2.09%
7	30.22 TiB	211.53 TiB	2.22%
8	297.69 TiB	2.33 PiB	24.99%
9	140.81 TiB	1.24 PiB	13.3%
10	364.44 TiB	3.56 PiB	38.25%
11	66.06 TiB	726.69 TiB	7.62%
	1.2 PiB Total

Low provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.

Propose a Dashboard

Report Detail

Report 31841 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Activity status not available

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:

3 issues

Number of providers: 29

Provider	Location	Total Deal Size	Percentage	Duplication	IPNI Misreporting	Total claims	Retrieval Rate	HTTP Retrievability	RPA
f010202	Dallas, Texas, US	100 TiB	1.05%	0.00%	Not reporting	39789	76.89%	76.89%	0.00%
f014686	Montréal, Quebec, CA	518.22 TiB	5.44%	0.00%	OK	118738	60.44%	60.44%	0.00%
f014699	Dallas, Texas, US	504.09 TiB	5.29%	0.00%	OK	118591	58.00%	58.00%	0.00%
f02837684	Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK	149.91 TiB	1.57%	0.00%	Not reporting	60564	75.86%	75.86%	0.00%
f02953066	Los Angeles, California, US	148.72 TiB	1.56%	0.00%	Not reporting	60485	76.75%	76.75%	0.00%
f02956073	Singapore, Singapore, SG	109.84 TiB	1.15%	0.00%	Not reporting	48853	76.63%	76.63%	0.00%
f03028412	Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN	98.91 TiB	1.04%	0.00%	Not reporting	24390	74.46%	74.46%	0.00%
f03080852	Toronto, Ontario, CA	339 TiB	3.56%	0.00%	Not reporting	92944	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03080854	Piscataway, New Jersey, US	299.63 TiB	3.15%	0.00%	Not reporting	92957	76.65%	76.65%	0.00%
f03091738	Dallas, Texas, US	892.03 TiB	9.36%	0.00%	Not reporting	91345	76.29%	76.29%	0.00%
f03148356	Ōi, Saitama, JP	198.84 TiB	2.09%	0.00%	Not reporting	74227	75.66%	75.66%	0.00%
f03156617	Sydney, New South Wales, AU	199.97 TiB	2.10%	0.00%	Not reporting	74384	76.45%	76.45%	0.00%
f03173124	Seoul, Seoul, KR	444.41 TiB	4.66%	0.00%	OK	106159	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03188440	Vancouver, British Columbia, CA	298.06 TiB	3.13%	0.00%	Not reporting	126907	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03188443	Singapore, Singapore, SG	447.41 TiB	4.70%	0.00%	Not reporting	106783	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03190614	Dubai, Dubai, AE	386.03 TiB	4.05%	0.00%	OK	126264	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03190616	Tokyo, Tokyo, JP	297 TiB	3.12%	0.00%	OK	126419	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03196399	Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, MY	78.28 TiB	0.82%	0.00%	OK	111215	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03196401	Osaka, Osaka, JP	78.88 TiB	0.83%	0.00%	OK	110746	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03201941	Toronto, Ontario, CA	488.63 TiB	5.13%	0.00%	OK	82000	76.08%	76.08%	0.00%
f03228953	Bangkok, Bangkok, TH	535.25 TiB	5.62%	0.00%	Not reporting	81652	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
f03251827	Singapore, Singapore, SG	78.47 TiB	0.82%	0.00%	Not reporting	50209	75.41%	75.41%	0.00%
f03251828	Dallas, Texas, US	80 TiB	0.84%	0.00%	Not reporting	50935	75.50%	75.50%	0.00%
f03254061	Montréal, Quebec, CA	596.91 TiB	6.27%	0.00%	OK	108351	75.68%	75.68%	0.00%
f03254063	Piscataway, New Jersey, US	597.5 TiB	6.27%	0.00%	Not reporting	107894	75.17%	75.17%	0.00%
f03254125	Dallas, Texas, US	339.06 TiB	3.56%	0.00%	OK	85502	64.48%	64.48%	0.00%
f03259560	Osaka, Osaka, JP	303.09 TiB	3.18%	0.00%	Not reporting	84175	75.62%	75.62%	0.00%
f03265465	Manila, Metro Manila, PH	678.47 TiB	7.12%	0.00%	OK	119516	59.29%	59.29%	0.00%
f03275720	Dallas, Texas, US	240 TiB	2.52%	0.00%	OK	122646	76.07%	76.07%	0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:

Healthy

Providers	Unique Data	Total Deals	Percentage
1	288 GiB	288 GiB	0%
2	93.34 TiB	186.69 TiB	1.95%
3	36.34 TiB	109.03 TiB	1.14%
4	31.97 TiB	127.88 TiB	1.34%
5	134.44 TiB	672.19 TiB	7.05%
6	33.19 TiB	199.13 TiB	2.09%
7	30.22 TiB	211.53 TiB	2.22%
8	297.69 TiB	2.33 PiB	24.99%
9	140.81 TiB	1.24 PiB	13.3%
10	364.44 TiB	3.56 PiB	38.25%
11	66.06 TiB	726.69 TiB	7.62%
	1.2 PiB Total

Low provider count

Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client	Total deals affected	Unique CIDs
No results.