Dashboard

Allocators

Allocators List
Metaaallocators List
ClientsStorage ProvidersComplianceAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search

jcphysics

Client ID: f03070890

GitHubView application on GitHubPulseView on Filecoin Pulse

Remaining DataCap

0 B

Allocated DataCap

4 PiB
Propose a Dashboard
Report Detail
Report 23088 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Enterprise

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

N/A

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Activity status not available

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
3 issues
Number of providers: 29
Provider
Location
Total Deal Size
Percentage
Duplication
IPNI Misreporting
Total claims
Retrieval Rate
HTTP Retrievability
RPA
f010202
Dallas, Texas, US
100 TiB
1.13%
0.00%
Not reporting
39789
71.18%
0.00%
0.00%
f014686
Montréal, Quebec, CA
106.53 TiB
1.20%
0.00%
OK
103262
65.41%
0.00%
0.00%
f014699
Dallas, Texas, US
242.63 TiB
2.74%
0.00%
OK
110224
65.88%
0.00%
0.00%
f02837684
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
149.91 TiB
1.69%
0.00%
Not reporting
60564
72.28%
0.00%
0.00%
f02953066
Los Angeles, California, US
148.72 TiB
1.68%
0.00%
Not reporting
60485
71.06%
0.00%
0.00%
f02956073
Singapore, Singapore, SG
109.84 TiB
1.24%
0.00%
Not reporting
48853
70.48%
0.00%
0.00%
f03028412
Guangzhou, Guangdong, CN
98.91 TiB
1.12%
0.00%
Not reporting
24390
69.43%
0.00%
0.00%
f03080852
Toronto, Ontario, CA
339 TiB
3.83%
0.00%
Not reporting
92944
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03080854
Piscataway, New Jersey, US
299.63 TiB
3.38%
0.00%
Not reporting
92957
71.57%
0.00%
0.00%
f03091738
Dallas, Texas, US
892.03 TiB
10.08%
0.00%
Not reporting
91345
71.55%
0.00%
0.00%
f03148356
Ōi, Saitama, JP
198.84 TiB
2.25%
0.00%
Not reporting
74227
73.38%
0.00%
0.00%
f03156617
Sydney, New South Wales, AU
199.97 TiB
2.26%
0.00%
Not reporting
74384
71.42%
0.00%
0.00%
f03173124
Seoul, Seoul, KR
444.41 TiB
5.02%
0.00%
OK
106159
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03188440
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
298.06 TiB
3.37%
0.00%
Not reporting
126907
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03188443
Singapore, Singapore, SG
447.41 TiB
5.05%
0.00%
Not reporting
106783
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03190614
Dubai, Dubai, AE
386.03 TiB
4.36%
0.00%
OK
126264
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03190616
Tokyo, Tokyo, JP
297 TiB
3.35%
0.00%
OK
126419
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03196399
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, MY
78.28 TiB
0.88%
0.00%
OK
111215
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03196401
Osaka, Osaka, JP
78.88 TiB
0.89%
0.00%
OK
110746
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03201941
Toronto, Ontario, CA
488.63 TiB
5.52%
0.00%
OK
82000
71.55%
0.00%
0.00%
f03228953
Bangkok, Bangkok, TH
535.25 TiB
6.05%
0.00%
Not reporting
81652
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
f03251827
Singapore, Singapore, SG
78.47 TiB
0.89%
0.00%
Not reporting
50209
70.56%
0.00%
0.00%
f03251828
Dallas, Texas, US
80 TiB
0.90%
0.00%
Not reporting
50935
66.46%
0.00%
0.00%
f03254061
Montréal, Quebec, CA
596.91 TiB
6.74%
0.00%
OK
108351
71.43%
0.00%
0.00%
f03254063
Piscataway, New Jersey, US
597.5 TiB
6.75%
0.00%
Not reporting
107894
70.13%
0.00%
0.00%
f03254125
Dallas, Texas, US
339.06 TiB
3.83%
0.00%
OK
85502
58.48%
0.00%
0.00%
f03259560
Osaka, Osaka, JP
303.09 TiB
3.42%
0.00%
Not reporting
84175
68.81%
0.00%
0.00%
f03265465
Manila, Metro Manila, PH
678.47 TiB
7.66%
0.00%
OK
119516
48.59%
0.00%
0.00%
f03275720
Dallas, Texas, US
240 TiB
2.71%
0.00%
OK
122646
71.42%
0.00%
0.00%

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
Healthy
Providers
Unique Data
Total Deals
Percentage
1
101.91 TiB
101.91 TiB
1.15%
2
41.03 TiB
82.06 TiB
0.92%
3
72.22 TiB
216.66 TiB
2.45%
4
80.06 TiB
320.25 TiB
3.62%
5
34.75 TiB
173.75 TiB
1.96%
6
40.81 TiB
244.88 TiB
2.77%
7
108.03 TiB
756.22 TiB
8.56%
8
223.25 TiB
1.74 PiB
20.22%
9
115.13 TiB
1.01 PiB
11.73%
10
411.41 TiB
4.02 PiB
46.58%
1.2 PiB Total
Low provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

Client
Total deals affected
Unique CIDs
No results.