f01081439
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
498.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.5%
Deal Percentage
99.8% / 497.81 TiB
Duplication
29340
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
No
N/A
7.69 days
Client is receiving DataCap from multiple allocators.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
498.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.5%
Deal Percentage
99.8% / 497.81 TiB
Duplication
29340
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
497.59 TiB
Total Deal Size
12.47%
Deal Percentage
99.8% / 496.59 TiB
Duplication
26158
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
96 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.41%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
278721
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
423.38 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.61%
Deal Percentage
99.76% / 422.38 TiB
Duplication
100762
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
423.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.61%
Deal Percentage
99.76% / 422.56 TiB
Duplication
115929
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
422.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.6%
Deal Percentage
99.76% / 421.97 TiB
Duplication
58788
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Tung Chung, Islands, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
96 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.41%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
279111
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
San Jose, California, US
Sample Piece URL not found
192 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.81%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
338184
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
192 TiB
Total Deal Size
4.81%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
433076
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
225 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.64%
Deal Percentage
6.06% / 13.63 TiB
Duplication
116752
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
224.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.64%
Deal Percentage
6.06% / 13.63 TiB
Duplication
127260
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
224.91 TiB
Total Deal Size
5.64%
Deal Percentage
6.06% / 13.63 TiB
Duplication
92276
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
90.97 TiB
Total Deal Size
2.28%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
16239
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
61.13 TiB
Total Deal Size
1.53%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
5391
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK
Sample Piece URL not found
321.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
8.07%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
321440
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 23.75 TiB | 47.5 TiB | 1.19% |
| 8 | 3.16 TiB | 25.25 TiB | 0.63% |
| 3 | 12.69 TiB | 38.06 TiB | 0.95% |
| 5 | 19.88 TiB | 2.31 PiB | 59.14% |
| 7 | 20.41 TiB | 142.84 TiB | 3.57% |
| 4 | 55.72 TiB | 263.75 TiB | 6.6% |
| 1 | 33.5 TiB | 33.5 TiB | 0.83% |
| 6 | 101.84 TiB | 611.06 TiB | 15.31% |
| 9 | 52.06 TiB | 468.56 TiB | 11.73% |
| 323 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| f03535091 | 19.78 TiB | 32 |