DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 286665

Client ID: f03648677

Report Detail
Report 286665 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

Yes

Client Contract Deviation

10

Average Time To First Deal

6.42 days

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
4 issues
Number of providers: 16

f03098965

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

604.47 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.72%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

124946

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03099008

Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN

Sample Piece URL not found

427.28 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.28%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

120603

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

13257 ms

Time to First Byte

7.48 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03099101

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

396.72 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.69%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

104522

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

13176 ms

Time to First Byte

7.46 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03099287

São Paulo, São Paulo, BR

Sample Piece URL not found

443.81 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.6%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

126510

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

15011 ms

Time to First Byte

7.33 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03099777

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

167.84 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.25%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

133918

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

12959 ms

Time to First Byte

7.75 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03099888

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE

Sample Piece URL not found

610 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.82%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

159832

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

14107 ms

Time to First Byte

7.48 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03100014

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

193.78 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.76%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

133979

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

12675 ms

Time to First Byte

7.6 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03100088

San Jose, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

609.56 TiB

Total Deal Size

11.81%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

138153

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

13982 ms

Time to First Byte

7.32 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03637813

San Jose, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

198 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.84%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

73638

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

11050 ms

Time to First Byte

4.76 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03637821

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE

Sample Piece URL not found

198 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.84%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

73573

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

11481 ms

Time to First Byte

9.58 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03641955

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE

Sample Piece URL not found

94 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.82%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

47334

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03641974

Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN

Sample Piece URL not found

94 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.82%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

47243

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

11803 ms

Time to First Byte

5.9 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03649204

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

283.06 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.49%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

141956

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

13084 ms

Time to First Byte

6.85 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03649212

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

265.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.15%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

141111

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03649217

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

286.69 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.56%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

158983

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

13124 ms

Time to First Byte

7.31 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03649227

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

286.56 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.55%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

155557

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
1
27.66 TiB
27.66 TiB
0.53%
7
23.59 TiB
165.16 TiB
3.2%
6
256 GiB
1.5 TiB
0.02%
3
126.84 TiB
380.53 TiB
7.37%
8
174.16 TiB
1.36 PiB
27%
4
279.5 TiB
1.09 PiB
21.66%
5
303.41 TiB
1.48 PiB
29.4%
2
278.31 TiB
556.63 TiB
10.78%
1.19 PiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
f03545597
1.84 PiB
26430