DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 220030

Client ID: f03647346

Report Detail
Report 220030 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

Yes

Client Contract Deviation

10

Average Time To First Deal

0.84 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
4 issues
Number of providers: 18

f03098965

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

786.78 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.46%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

139728

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03099008

Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN

Sample Piece URL not found

712.56 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.57%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

120603

Total Claims

0%

RPA

0%

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

13257 ms

Time to First Byte

7.48 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03099101

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

752.47 TiB

Total Deal Size

9.05%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

128134

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

13176 ms

Time to First Byte

7.46 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03099287

São Paulo, São Paulo, BR

Sample Piece URL not found

736.59 TiB

Total Deal Size

8.85%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

145171

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

15011 ms

Time to First Byte

7.33 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03099888

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE

Sample Piece URL not found

1.02 PiB

Total Deal Size

12.57%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

181020

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

14107 ms

Time to First Byte

7.48 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03100088

Mountain View, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

999.5 TiB

Total Deal Size

12.01%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

159809

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

13982 ms

Time to First Byte

7.32 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03637813

Mountain View, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

249.97 TiB

Total Deal Size

3%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

73638

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

11050 ms

Time to First Byte

4.76 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03637821

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE

Sample Piece URL not found

250 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.01%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

73573

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

11481 ms

Time to First Byte

9.58 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03641915

São Paulo, São Paulo, BR

Sample Piece URL not found

224 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.69%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

50879

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03641951

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

149.88 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.8%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

47190

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03641955

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE

Sample Piece URL not found

130.84 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.57%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

47334

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03641964

Mountain View, California, US

Sample Piece URL not found

133.03 TiB

Total Deal Size

1.6%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

47152

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03641974

Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN

Sample Piece URL not found

334.38 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.02%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

47243

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

11803 ms

Time to First Byte

5.9 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03641984

São Paulo, São Paulo, BR

Sample Piece URL not found

295.53 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.55%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

47658

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03649204

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

341.03 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.1%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

141956

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

13084 ms

Time to First Byte

6.85 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03649212

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

Sample Piece URL not found

352.66 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.24%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

141111

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03649217

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

447.22 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.38%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

158983

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

13124 ms

Time to First Byte

7.31 Mbps

Bandwidth

f03649227

Singapore, Singapore, SG

Sample Piece URL not found

377.09 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.53%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

155557

Total Claims

N/A

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

100%

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
1 issue
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
7
107.13 TiB
749.88 TiB
9.01%
8
312.19 TiB
2.44 PiB
30.02%
5
543.88 TiB
2.66 PiB
32.68%
3
247.97 TiB
743.91 TiB
8.94%
6
156.66 TiB
939.94 TiB
11.29%
2
576 GiB
1.13 TiB
0.01%
1
320 GiB
320 GiB
0%
4
166.78 TiB
667.13 TiB
8.01%
1.5 PiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
f03633013
461.78 TiB
11109