f02808899
Singapore, Singapore, SG
311.22 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.59%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
233684
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Open
Yes
10
1.35 day
Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.
Client was active in last 60 days or spent all its DataCap
The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.
Singapore, Singapore, SG
311.22 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.59%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
233684
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH
Sample Piece URL not found
310.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.57%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
238473
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Mueang Nonthaburi, Nonthaburi, TH
310.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.58%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
235266
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
337.75 TiB
Total Deal Size
10.41%
Deal Percentage
0.02% / 64 GiB
Duplication
326749
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
98.81 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.05%
Deal Percentage
0.13% / 128 GiB
Duplication
312740
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
367.63 TiB
Total Deal Size
11.33%
Deal Percentage
0.04% / 160 GiB
Duplication
314580
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10435 ms
Time to First Byte
13.83 Mbps
Bandwidth
Hanoi, Hanoi, VN
Sample Piece URL not found
126.94 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.91%
Deal Percentage
0.05% / 64 GiB
Duplication
314642
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10429 ms
Time to First Byte
17.22 Mbps
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
310.69 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.58%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
101700
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
313.53 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.66%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
102884
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
313.56 TiB
Total Deal Size
9.67%
Deal Percentage
0% / 0 B
Duplication
105508
Total Claims
0%
RPA
0%
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10428 ms
Time to First Byte
14.52 Mbps
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
100.66 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.1%
Deal Percentage
0.09% / 96 GiB
Duplication
127879
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10422 ms
Time to First Byte
16.66 Mbps
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Sample Piece URL not found
127.28 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.92%
Deal Percentage
0.1% / 128 GiB
Duplication
139352
Total Claims
N/A
RPA
N/A
Consistent RPA
100%
Inconsistent RPA
10423 ms
Time to First Byte
16.26 Mbps
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
112.03 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.45%
Deal Percentage
0.06% / 64 GiB
Duplication
137751
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
102.44 TiB
Total Deal Size
3.16%
Deal Percentage
0.06% / 64 GiB
Duplication
134551
Total Claims
100%
RPA
100%
Consistent RPA
0%
Inconsistent RPA
N/A
Time to First Byte
N/A
Bandwidth
The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.
| Providers | Unique Data | Total Deals | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 10.72 TiB | 32.16 TiB | 0.99% |
| 7 | 106.84 TiB | 748.19 TiB | 23.06% |
| 5 | 33.66 TiB | 168.31 TiB | 5.18% |
| 8 | 206.94 TiB | 1.62 PiB | 51.04% |
| 4 | 23.09 TiB | 92.38 TiB | 2.84% |
| 2 | 15.44 TiB | 30.88 TiB | 0.95% |
| 6 | 85.09 TiB | 510.59 TiB | 15.73% |
| 1 | 5.63 TiB | 5.63 TiB | 0.17% |
| 487.41 TiB Total |
The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.
However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.
| Client | Total Deals Affected | Unique CIDs |
|---|---|---|
| f03634275 | 3 TiB | 57 |