DashboardAllocatorsClientsStorage ProvidersAlertsAbout

Ecosystem

Filecoin
Fil+
Documentation
Search
Propose a Dashboard

Report 190719

Client ID: f03631924

Report Detail
Report 190719 from

Client Overview

Type of Data

Open

Using Contract

No

Client Contract Deviation

N/A

Average Time To First Deal

0.20 day

DataCap Allocations

Client is receiving DataCap from single allocator.

Activity

Client has unspent DataCap and was inactive for more than a 2 months

Storage Provider Distribution

The below table shows the distribution of storage providers that have stored data for this client.

Status:
1 issue
Number of providers: 20

f03098965

Singapore, Singapore, SG

440.47 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.35%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

132680

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03099008

Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN

440.03 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.34%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

120603

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03099101

Singapore, Singapore, SG

374.06 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.54%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

102453

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03099287

São Paulo, São Paulo, BR

433.69 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.26%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

128508

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03099888

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE

380.34 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.62%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

181020

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03100006

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

564.69 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.85%

Deal Percentage

0.01% / 32 GiB

Duplication

79438

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03100007

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

538.72 TiB

Total Deal Size

6.54%

Deal Percentage

0.01% / 32 GiB

Duplication

79372

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03100088

Mountain View, California, US

383.53 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.65%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

159809

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03289271

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE

451.63 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.48%

Deal Percentage

0.01% / 32 GiB

Duplication

155658

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03315260

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE

648.34 TiB

Total Deal Size

7.87%

Deal Percentage

0% / 32 GiB

Duplication

224838

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03367915

Mountain View, California, US

486.34 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.9%

Deal Percentage

0.01% / 32 GiB

Duplication

150128

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03368008

Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN

304.66 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.7%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

91228

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03542777

Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), VN

441.81 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.36%

Deal Percentage

0.01% / 32 GiB

Duplication

152776

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03559187

Mountain View, California, US

248.72 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.02%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

107914

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03603117

Mountain View, California, US

461 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.59%

Deal Percentage

0.01% / 32 GiB

Duplication

129023

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03607310

São Paulo, São Paulo, BR

385.69 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.68%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

67475

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03649204

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

250 TiB

Total Deal Size

3.03%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

141956

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03649212

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, HK

200 TiB

Total Deal Size

2.43%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

141111

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03649217

Singapore, Singapore, SG

340.81 TiB

Total Deal Size

4.14%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

158983

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

f03649227

Singapore, Singapore, SG

466.16 TiB

Total Deal Size

5.66%

Deal Percentage

0% / 0 B

Duplication

155557

Total Claims

100%

RPA

N/A

Consistent RPA

N/A

Inconsistent RPA

N/A

Time to First Byte

N/A

Bandwidth

  • RPA - default Random Piece Availability
  • Consistent - retrievability of Storage Providers including CAR files only
  • Inconsistent - retrievability of Storage Providers excluding the CAR files / including other available files that are not CAR files

Deal Data Replication

The below table shows how each many unique data are replicated across storage providers.

Status:
2 issues
ProvidersUnique DataTotal DealsPercentage
9
93.72 TiB
843.47 TiB
10.23%
8
615 TiB
4.8 PiB
59.7%
7
194.69 TiB
1.33 PiB
16.53%
6
179.81 TiB
1.05 PiB
13.09%
10
32 GiB
544 GiB
0%
5
7 TiB
35 TiB
0.42%
1.06 PiB Total
Wrong provider count
Sufficient provider count

Deal Data Shared with other Clients

The below table shows how many unique data are shared with other clients. Usually different applications owns different data and should not resolve to the same CID.

However, this could be possible if all below clients use same software to prepare for the exact same dataset or they belong to a series of LDN applications for the same dataset.

ClientTotal Deals AffectedUnique CIDs
No results.